I am just curious as to why anyone thinks Melvin is a decent GM? He has not had a single trade we can honestly look back on that he's hit on to put the team over the top to be a winner. In fact, the Leinbrink trade is starting to possibly look like it was a bad one especially if Inman continues to pitch like he is. He sold Hardy at his lowest point even though he had more than an ample opportunity to have moved him the year before to get some legitimate pitching possibly from Boston. To get pitching, you have to give up something to get. And Hardy offered teams a shortstop with some pop and good defense. And this argument about Melvin taking us out of the depths of losing is nothing more than a myth. Ulice Payne taking over the team from Wendy was the start. Doug happened to be in the right place at the right time even though Dean Taylor started the improvement by stressing on player development which was lacking when back in the Bando era. It was too bad Yost took the fall in 2008. It actually reminded me of Mike Sherman canning Donnatel trying to cover up for the team's biggest problem. In fact, Melvin then completely pulled a Sherman and had a complete buddy hire in Macha.