Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

sheethead

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,877

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by sheethead

  1. sheethead
    That bullpen sure sticks together. All they wanted was for Torres to get another save. Silly me for worrying.
  2. sheethead
    Nah, Riske came in and gave up a BB and HR. He needs some of the heat too. Good to see him back, where is Tavarez when you need him.
  3. sheethead
    Our classy fans can find a reason in any game to boo. Still a 5 run lead, people. Shesh. I won't condone the booing, but I think they were sensing something. Now a one run lead.
  4. sheethead
    That would be very difficult for me too. I still call them the d-rays every once in a while.
  5. sheethead
    Would any of the Yost "haters" actually disagreed with putting Torres in even if he had blown the game? Ned Yost is not a good manager. I was begging for him to replace Mota with Torres, and he did. For that I thanked Ned Yost in this very thread.
  6. sheethead
    Yosted!
  7. sheethead
    Woah, coming back in from commercial Powell had to mention something about Juan Nieves, and he was very specific.
  8. sheethead
    Powell - "back to the business at hand." Very subtle, unlike BA who is so blatent.
  9. sheethead
    Atta boy Gabe!!
  10. sheethead
    BA is plain awful everyday.
  11. sheethead
    The walks need to be added back in. Still, 60% is pretty amazing.
  12. sheethead
    What?!?!? How in the world does Prince get 2 ITPHRs in 2 years?
  13. sheethead
    Haha, I see. Seemed like you were referring to a rather specific argument in your difficult-to-read post. BTW, who are these devil rays you are referring to?
  14. sheethead
    http://homerderby.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/were-not-worthy.jpg
  15. sheethead
    The Yankees gobbled him up yesterday/today.
  16. sheethead
    If you are referring to me being "pre-disposed," you couldn't be farther off. And frankly, I think you just don't get it.
  17. sheethead
    Wow, nice find. Good to see Simon's baseball career is back on track, or maybe it's just become what it should have been the whole time.
  18. sheethead
    I think today is a good day to reach for a new high point in the season record.
  19. sheethead
    You win. You're right. You're brilliant. Thank you, but brilliant is an overstatement. http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/smile.gif I, like Ned, am an idiot. Don't be so hard on yourself, not everything is black and white. Now you have to say 3 good things about yourself.
  20. sheethead
    I didn't say that anyone disagreed with every decision Ned makes... every move the guy makes is viewed with a skewed eye, and the assumption is that it's going to be the wrong decision. Contradiction? If someone thinks every move the guy makes is going to be wrong, isn't it safe to you you think someone out there disagrees with every decision made? If someone believes a move to be wrong, then that person most likely disagrees with the decision, right?
  21. sheethead
    You would've chosen DiFelice. I never said this. What I did say was he would have been a better option than Tavarez (who is no longer with us thank God). The fact that he chose to stick with Tavarez rather than bring in some other schmoe doesn't bother me in the least. I can see why you are defending Yost regarding this game. I'm happy you weren't bothered. I was. If you wish to continue this debate of semantics though, I can go all day. I already won the semantics debate (unless you wish to argue Tavarez was the best available option no matter how bad all the other options were), so I am done with that argument. You say you used the word "about" to discount the equality of the bad options, but then continue to say there was no difference in who they brought in. Contradiction, which is it? Equal or not equal, no about about it. then you should be upset that he pitched the 11th I was.
  22. sheethead
    I am going to pretend Jullian Tavarez never pitched for the Brewers.
  23. sheethead
    Seems we had 4 options, loss, loss, loss, bad loss. Really? I didn't see it that way. I saw loss, probably lose, maybe lose, gives us a chance.
  24. sheethead
    And for you to continue to harp on the fact that DiFelice was a far superior option I mentioned it once. And you did say about equally, that is correct. But in saying this you are admitting there were better options, unless you argue that Tavarez was the best option.
  25. sheethead
    I usually think Tim Kurkijan does a fine job, but this thought is ludicrous. Sure the Cubs would like Sheets, he is a staff ace. But why mention something that has almost 0% chance of happening. Hey Tim, might the Cubs go after the Mets Santana or the Jays Halladay as well? ESPN is just desperate to see the Cubs win the World Series, so this kind of banter is pretty much towing the Corporate line imo.
×
×
  • Create New...