Well it lets players get closer to their actual worth at their prime years and would shift FA to paying more towards actual value/expected future value/performance as opposed to FA being for paying dudes for past performance. Reducing arbitration years is fine but that really hurts the small market teams since all the good FAs will go to big markets/teams that can afford them. no it doesn't. if you increase arbitration it means that mediocre players will start getting paid more, which will in turn cause the good and elite players to get paid far more than them, and when they hit FA, they'll expect a jump from beyond that. So yes, while in their prime they'll want more money, but no agent would then say "ah, he was paid fairly in his prime, we wont ask for more on the open market", they'll exploit that fact that player was paid $xx million and use that as the starting point for open bids. only way to increase comp during arb years is to put a cap when players hit the open market. "small market" teams are still owned by billionaires. I will never buy into the notion that a small market team can't afford a top FA. They just choose not to run in the red to win.