I agree with you tommyboy about the impact he will have on the game. He may not even make it to the majors. I think their reasoning for calling him the Lebron of baseball is how talented he is in all areas of the game. Baseball is so different from basketball that you won't have a player be a dominating hitter, fielder and pitcher all in one. In basketball Lebron can be a dominating defender, scorer, passer, shooter and so on. The fact that this 16 year old hits 96 on the gun already and is a dominating defensive catcher, hits for power, hits for average and has great speed is what makes people draw comparisons to Lebron. When you add the fact that he is playing the way A-Rod and Griffey did when they were seniors you could say he is 2 years ahead of them and their talent is obvious. The fact that he went to a tournament with other talented kids his age and older and went 12 for 12 with 11 home runs and a double is amazing. It's not like he did it in little league. When you look at the fact that no one has dominated in all areas of the game the way he has at 16 years old in baseball before and Lebron dominated at 16 years old in all areas in basketball it's not that crazy of a comparison. Also when you consider these writers are trying to draw attention to their article it's not going to work by saying "He is a modern day Robin Yount that also throws a 96 mph fastball". What I'm interested in seeing is what position he ends up at. You can be extremely talented in all areas but if he ends up not being able to throw a 2nd pitch, hit MLB quality breaking balls or throw out MLB runners... what difference does it make? Like I said before I didn't want to be interested in this kid or excited to see him play before I read the article. After reading it, he doesn't seem like a bad kid and depending on his position he could be in the pros in 3 years.