I like it, with both Patrick and Mis. Patrick is a warrior and has moxie. Mis’ upside speaks for itself.
As for the rest, suppose Priester and Woody are out of the picture at the front end. I personally keep Ashby in the pen. I really like him in that role. Even though I like Ashby better than Hall, I’d probably roll the dice on Hall as a starter before I disrupt weaponizing Ashby out of the pen.
So who are the other three starters? With Peralta, Woody, and Priester not there, that is significant manpower deficit on paper compared to last year.
I am intrigued by Harrison and Gasser. All Henderson has done is produce even if he needs another mainstay pitch. Those might be my next three but it would be absurd to say that any are proven at this level. If any of those three wet the bed, or even if we want a sixth starter, I’d give Hall a long look if his velo and arm look right. A big issue for him is being capable past even four innings regularly. Even if Hall isn’t a starter, he could backstop any starter who falters in the first few innings and keep us in the game with a solid 3-4 innings. That might be an ideal Hall role.
Sproat feels like he he’s got some work to do at AAA in terms of growth and adjustments. I can’t say much about Drohan although I’m intrigued. Crow is a guy I’ve always liked due to his uncommon spin rate and curveball. But all three might need to prove more in terms of triple A work for various reasons.
I like all these guys in time but proven starting pitching looks iffy. How much magic does Hook’s team have in them to get these guys established? Even major talents like Burnes, Woody, and Peralta had a lot of development at this level, with lots of ups and downs to show for it.