I think that's equally a draft and developmental issue. If you draft guys who don't have plus stuff and/or control then they are going to move more slowly... seriously if developing MLB plus pitches was that easy every pitcher would have them. I don't mean to suggest that the Brewers are great or even good at developing pitchers, but let's be honest, most of these guys have had a very long way to go to become MLB quality starters. I have many issues with the Brewers' development staff, but the pitching progression isn't one of them. They are baselines you need to have success at each level and if a pitcher doesn't have pretty good arsenal with decent control they are going to get shredded at AA. Their are some very wide or low strike zones in A ball that pitchers can take advantage of, those advantages start to disappear the higher up the ladder you go. For example Lorenzo was exploiting a particular umpire's strike zone last night, the T-Rats have had that same crew a bunch over the last month so they know the nuances of both umpires' zone very well. Well you know more than I do so I'll defer on the strike zone issue, but that seems like a tough sell to me. The argument for needing a baseline of success at every level is one I don't buy at all. Did Peralta have a baseline of success at AAA? He had some good stretches, I'll give you that. The final numbers were not very good. I certainly would not call his arsenal plus. He has a plus fastball but I would think his secondary pitches are not in the plus range, at least not yet. Still, despite the numbers I would rather have Peralta in the rotation than Narveson, Estrada, Figaro, Fiers, Burgos, and any number of other guys that have been given a shot.