Gee some of you guys would be fun, over a beer, to say 'what a nice night it is'. The comebacks, I can see it now... 'who defines what is nice'.... 'it is not night in Australia'.... 'my dog does not like 75 degrees'.... 'it is too humid'.... 'it is to dry'.... 'explain to me what is nice about it, I saw a mosquito'.... etc re this comment "why should the Brewers ever overpay for anything? I've yet to see you rationally justify an overpay" You are completely missing my point (on purpose, I think). It is possible that 1 or 2 extra wins over the last two months for the Brewers are more valuable than to another team. Hence, if Hart (just an example) were available it may be that ONLY the Brewers would be interested. I am not talking about giving up any prospect, but just relieving Seattle of some salary. Hence the Brewers, from their viewpoint, are paying what is value to them, but in the overall league scenario it is a $$$ overpay. I prefer to keep talent if a few extra dollars can get a guy for half a year. A couple of fellow posters understood what I meant. The ones who don't understand are choosing not to understand. And I find it interesting that a fellow fan say 'if you cant convince me what you think, then you are irrational'. That is a sad state of affairs! I just posted what I think. And I think I have some good reason behind it. And I will not be beaten down because 'I cant convince anyone'. Geez