What others are saying is build the strongest system possible with the most impact players you can possibly get regardless of position. I think you are completely misunderstanding what I said. I agree with the whole best available idea as I said. What am I arguing though is that if the players you are looking at are mostly comparable talent wise then drafting for need isn't always a terrible idea. I don't know how the Brewers grade players, but let's say they use 1-100 scale. If Player A is graded as a 90 and Player B is graded as an 87 then BPA dictates that you take player A. But if the Brewers are drafting and Player A is an outfielder, which the Brewers are loaded up on on multiple levels of their system and in the majors, and player B is a shortstop, which the Brewers desperately need because they have none, then I don't see why you can't take Player B and still be happy with the pick. I'm not saying you take the best available shortstop just because you need a shortstop. I've never said they should do that. *New paragraph* http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/wink.gif In the case of this draft, if the Brewers have Cron and Lindor graded mostly even, even if Cron is slightly ahead, then I don't see why they should take Cron if they are both available. I believe I read that he mostly profiles at first base whereas Lindor is a shortstop. Shortstops tend to be more able to switch positions later on if they need to (3rd, 2nd, CF, as I said) or they can be a super utility player. They can be kept on the roster as defensive specialists, something you'd never do with a first basemen. They are also much harder to replace than a first basemen and a good SS is going to have much higher trade value than a good 1B because they are not as common. If for some reason Cron gets to the big leagues and can't hit MLB pitching, he's useless. They aren't going to keep him on the roster just because he can play good defense at first base. We all thought Matt LaPorta would mash it all over the field but he is a just career .237 hitter through 700 major league at bats. So basically you have two guys graded the same but one guy offers all these other advantages. So why not pick him? And let's be honest, we are talking about a guy who is supposedly be considered as the number two overall pick in one of the deepest drafts in recent memory. It's not like picking him at #12 is going to be a major reach. I'd be surprised if he even made it that far. I'm not saying that Cron is a bad player or I'd be disappointed with him in the system. I'm just saying if the option was Cron or Lindor, I'd take Lindor. And if, when picking, they are debating between two players who they view as mostly even, why not take the one at the position you desperately need?