Jump to content
Sale v. Miz in an epic clash today! Come join our game thread! ×
Brewer Fanatic

82brewcrew82

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,086

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by 82brewcrew82

  1. 82brewcrew82
    Bless your heart. You have a good day now.
  2. 82brewcrew82
    Nor has any other team found a good enough reason to acquire him despite his minor and/or major league numbers.
  3. 82brewcrew82
    You're right. Mixed results for sure and I have no issue with the guy getting a shot.
  4. 82brewcrew82
    Is 230 at bats enough to make the determination that Keston has improved? Are we ignoring the previous 500 or so at bats that say he isn't very good at all? I tend to be in the camp that think bringing Keston up is worth the try but its not a different gamble than trading for Winker. There are reasons to think it may help but plenty of reasons to think it might not.
  5. 82brewcrew82
    This might be a good point. Maybe Keston has some trade value as a well performing rebound player in AAA. If he comes up and fails again, he may have zero utility. He may have more value to the Brewers as a AAA trade chip.
  6. 82brewcrew82
    Are you saying that something that has proven to be awful to this point in the season has zero chance of turning it around despite a proven track record of performance in past seasons?
  7. 82brewcrew82
    Wrong. "If you are making a general statement and you say that something is the exception that proves the rule, you mean that although it seems to contradict your statement, in most other cases your statement will be true. " "the presence of an exception applying to a specific case establishes ("proves") that a general rule exists" You're entire argument is hedging talk. "Pigs could fly, but I don't think it's likely". Or maybe more of a Monty Python skit at this point. Either way, you keep pining for something that has literally never happened.
  8. 82brewcrew82
    Ever heard of the exception the proves the rule? 2011 is kinda exactly like that. The only reason the Cards are 4 times more likely to win the division (according to some) this year is that there are more games left to play. Either way, my super proprietary formula says the Cards are 100% done and I've never backed off of that.
  9. 82brewcrew82
    Those odds seem to be dropping like a rock. Cardinals are, and have been, done.
  10. 82brewcrew82
    So this is one of the very worst teams in Cardinals history. Cool.
  11. 82brewcrew82
    Specifically Mr. Wainwright.
  12. 82brewcrew82
    That's all I'm saying.
  13. 82brewcrew82
    I say the Cards are done. If I'm wrong, I'll own it.
  14. 82brewcrew82
    12 years ago is not recent and the roster and situation are not the same in any way. Cardinals are out of it.
  15. 82brewcrew82
    Attention?
  16. 82brewcrew82
    If you can use stats you like, others can use stats they like. Either way, you didn't prove the point you wanted to.. Those numbers do not reflect a good pitching staff.
  17. 82brewcrew82
    All of that is true but they are going to have to play a whole lot better than they have and they have shown zero indication that they can.
  18. 82brewcrew82
    I hadn't realized that Contreras had been that awful.
  19. 82brewcrew82
    Sure, except literally no one has said that.
  20. 82brewcrew82
    This is exactly right and the reason run differential is a bad argument on its own. I wish I could give the original post multiple thumbs up and giant blinking stars.
  21. 82brewcrew82
    How does that not mean anything when the question you posed was whether any of these teams have shown the ability to have that kind of run? You can't ask that then say the proof doesn't mean anything. Meanwhile, the one team that actually hasn't shown that ability is just assumed to have that run in them?
  22. 82brewcrew82
    They also went something like 20-8 the first month. So they have definitely shown they can.
  23. 82brewcrew82
    Pittsburgh has.
  24. 82brewcrew82
    Who says the are under performing? The fangrapsh graph you posted sure doesn't think they are.
  25. 82brewcrew82
    It might be much if your pitching and defense are at the other end of the spectrum.
×
×
  • Create New...