That is very flawed logic. Villar wasn't playing, and it was obvious he wasn't going to play. This has been pointed out countless times in countless threads. Villar was ready to come off the DL for at least a week when he was dealt, yet the Brewers kept him there. For whatever reason, Counsell was done with him. Looking at his stats with Baltimore, and saying he would have done that in Milwaukee, is comparing apples and oranges. Villar was the definition of a "throw-in" in that deal. I hope Villar plays well for the Orioles and becomes a good Major League regular. I loved the energy and enthusiasm he brought. He was never going to achieve that with the Brewers, though. Counsell is as much to blame as Stearns. To say that Counsell wasn't playing Villar so he needed to be traded takes two wrongs and tries to call it right. Fair enough, but we aren't playing in a vacuum, either. Personally I would have loved for them to give Villar the job and stick with him, but Counsell wasn't going to do that, and Counsell isn't going anywhere anytime soon. It was probably a win that Stearns was able to flip him for any value at all, considering he was probably an eyelash close to being DFA'd. I, too, hope that Schoop can put up great numbers next year. I think that best case, though, he's going to put up numbers similar to what Rickie Weeks did in an average year - .260 average, 15-20 HRs, and a bunch of Ks. I'd love for them to go grab someone like Daniel Murphy on a 1-2 year deal, as they don't need another total free swinger in the lineup every day. I guess it is what it is, though.