No, this isn't anything new. Every team, every year has a game or more where they need to bring up someone from the bullpen or minors to start a game in a pinch. They try to get 4 innings, with a long reliever following him. You can call Peralta a tandem starter, piggyback, whatever you want but it's the same thing as long relief. Sorry, this new philosophy you've been touting is not becoming true. Also, I like the way you keep saying "it's coming." That way you can never be wrong. This is a little different in that they technically have a starter available to take the turn in Peralta, so it isn't a true bullpen game. It's more of a "our young starter sucks in the first inning, so lets throw the noodles against a wall" game. Results are pretty much the same though. He said, largely circumstantial. What I want to talk about is what I think is the blueprint of the perfect pitching staff for a small to mid-market team like the crew. The idea of 9-10 starter type arms that tbbc talked about in past posts is the answere for a team that can’t afford the Max Scherzer’s. 5 non-ace starters that can keep the team in the game, if their pitching well, let them pitch or take them out before the 3rd time thru, replaced by the starter( whose the better arm than the middle reliever) that can go 3 + strong to finish or get you to high lev arm that can close. If a pen has 4 or 5 starter arms they don’t need a Claudio. 3-4 high lev back end arms that can go 2 innings if needed, with quality starter arms would give you a well rested pen. No Barnes Williams type arms on this staff. My pen for the crew later in year: Burnes( 2-4 innings ) Woodruff( 2-4 innings) Peralta( 2-4 innings) Guerra(2-4 innings) Jeffress Claudio Hader Rasmussen/deadline aquisition Then in playoffs replace Claudio with position player. That would be a true superpen.