Plug Jansen into any trade generator you want, what you are proposing we trade for him, with only two years of control is crazy whacked out insanity. If that is what it takes, I'm not even making a phone call.
Disagree 100%.
Sterns said they are not going rebuild mode. (full steam ahead with rookies and prospects would be re-build mode)
Trading Burns doesn't mean they are dead in the free agent market, I think just the opposite. They are going to have to do something to help soften the loss of Burnes, adding a free agent pitcher (Clevinger - but I highly doubt they get him that cheap) and a bat (Abreu) is exactly the kind of moves I would expect them to make if they Trade Burnes.
Not a chance in hell you get Woodruff for 6 years 90 million, not a single possible chance of that happening. 15 million per season? Try 25 million, and that may still not get it done.
Trade Renfroe then bring in another vet OFer?
Why bother unless the return for Renfroe is far better than we think it would be.
I say keep Renfroe, and avoid guys like McCutchen. We have Renfroe in house, and he was not part of the offensive issues we endured in 2022.
If you will notice, the articles generate almost no discussion, they just sit there, clogging up the actual discussion topics.
Ok, that is all I will say about it, carry on.
Relax man, Brock is open to opinions about content on this site.
As strongly as you feel about "JUST DON'T CLICK ON THEM" others feel just as strongly about getting the articles off the forums.
They just clog up the forums in my opinion. There is already a spot for them, so why have them appear in two places? People who want to read them know where to find them.
So let me get this straight. The players wanted to keep the option of shifts, even though it goes against them as hitters?
Interesting.
I thought they would be against the shift so they could provide more offense and boost their stats, hence allowing them to make more millions than they already do.