Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Robocaller

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Robocaller

  1. AA wouldn't be much different. They shouldn't have let him come out for the 4th. 95 pitches, 9 outs. Are they trying to mess with his health? High pitch innings are worse than the same number of pitches spread out over more innings.
  2. Ashby can't get the ball in the zone. 93.6 on a sinker for a LH starting pitcher is OK, but that lack of control is killing him.
  3. As soon as Woodruff was lost for the season, I wanted Burnes and Adames traded for market value or better. Of course I would have liked more than what they got--like if the two guys were a year younger, or they added a promising but flawed pitcher who played in A ball last year. But if we kept Burnes, all we would be getting is a draft pick for him. So the two players we got have to have more value in 2024-2029 than Burnes would have given us in 2024. That will likely be the case. We could end up huge winners. If we believe in our pitching lab, we'll definitely be big winners. Those of you who think we lost this on value don't know how players are valued. Of course, we should win on value because we gave up the biggest value player. Now let's see what we can get for Adames.
  4. Given how badly the top-winning teams are doing in the playoffs this year, in the future can we stop the posts that promote an "all-in or nothing" strategy instead of a "piece of the apple" philosophy?
  5. Obviously the chance of getting back to the playoffs will largely be dependent on the trades/signings they make. I don't know how aggressively they'll seek to trade our players in their last year of arbitration, or how badly Woodruff is injured. But yeah, if Woodruff will miss most of the season, and we trade Burnes and Adames and don't get back MLB-ready talent, there's no reason to keep Yelich, if they are offered anything close to being worthwhile. I just don't know how things will sort out.
  6. I don't think they'd need to pay any of his salary if they traded him to the right team. The bigger question is why would you trade him when he was one of only two players who hit well for a whole season?
  7. The answer to that is of course, "DUH!" A better question would be how many players, among Burnes, Woodruff, Adames, Santana, and Canha, can we lose and still be a contender?
  8. You've identified the two problems. :-)
  9. how was Aaron Rodgers not the first 12 posted?
  10. This is one type of "article" I like to see "published" here--presenting a little bit of research, even though I could have done it myself in 10 minutes. It has value. The problem is, the word count is about 4X what is needed, and the extra words hinder extracting the information from the story. Does Brock pay you guys by word count?
  11. Maybe. They have control of the situation now. If he rakes in spring training, it will be hard to send him down.
  12. Perkins injury is probably to blame, but keeping Wiemer on the ML roster to be a 5th OF is malpractice by they front office. They're losing a year of service.
  13. I don't know why Anderson isn't playing at all. At least theoretically he could hit again like he did at the beginning of the year, at least for a stretch. But if they aren't giving Anderson ABs, then . . . meh. . . why not?
  14. Bad timing of this "article." He's been 0-14 over his last 5 games. But he did provide a spark for a while. He's an interesting case. A guy whose prospect star dimmed, then made it to the majors where he's performed like an average starter. Proof that there are exceptions to players whose prospect status dimmed, who usually never make it back (unless an injury was the cause of their status dropping).
  15. there is none. irony1 | ˈīrənē | noun (plural ironies) the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect: Unless you have a very odd definition of "ace," or one of the other words I used.
  16. which means it's baseball--random stuff happens--and thus you can't count that your ace will dominate every playoff game.
  17. I looked at some World Series winner predictors. Brewers were anywhere from 7th to 14th. There might be 4 teams that no one wants to run into during the playoffs, but the Brewers aren't one.
  18. This article would be true if the Brewers win over 70% of the rest of their games this season. Otherwise, it's ludicrous.
  19. There's really no significant info there. If Brock wants to pay you for this, that's his right. Maybe you've got a kid in college you have to pay for. If so, more power to you; I won't be a hater. Hell, I won't even be a hater if you are doing it for beer money. But you didn't do due diligence. At minimum you should have searched for scouting reports, what their signing bonuses were, and asked for info from the few guys on this site who watch a ton of minor league games. You're not the only one who posts an "article" based on basically no research. It might help internet traffic to the site, but it reduces my enjoyment.
  20. A lot of pitchers in the DSL have control problems. These guys do not, which is one reason why they're doing well in the DSL. It doesn't signify that they're likely to do well in higher minors. Stuff is much more important than DSL stats. Unless you have some information on what they're throwing, you're not really contributing anything to the discussion. Only one of them has good SO numbers (another thing that tends to lead to success later--missing bats).
×
×
  • Create New...