Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Jim French Stepstool

Verified Member
  • Posts

    5,133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Jim French Stepstool

  1. I'm guessing Miz is slated for one of the LA games, meaning he'll either start or (more likely) be used in a similar fashion to Saturdays' game.
  2. Speaking primarily of the BB GM (Marc VandeWettering), It's closer to the latter, but much more involved. His description is to 'collaborate' w/Greg Gard on things such as roster management & recruiting, which suggests to me that he focuses on the year-to-year turnover, tries to manage who may or may not appear to be a long-term commitment & how that effects roster structure going forward, and is also the point man regarding revenue allocated to BB (Can we afford this transfer? If we pay A, B, & C "X" number of dollars, how much do we have left for D & E, and will that be enough?) He also is in charge of non-conference scheduling. I doubt that his recruiting involvement goes any further than input as to how a prospective recruit might effect the current/future rosters, and how much can be comfortably allocated to a particular kid. Nothing regarding scouting or actually hitting the recruiting trail. I'm guessing the FB GM has similar duties. But one never knows what Fickell might have written into his deal AFA additional control. I suspect it's a collaborative thing as well, as unlike the NBA or NFL the AD is the 'boss', not the GM.
  3. Some of you have watched Adams much more than I, so you can tell me if I'm nuts or not. Is there a little bit of Ian Happ there in his approach & overall offensive game?
  4. The last time or two I've seen Snell he seemed to be throwing the ball really well & locating. It'll be tough if that continues. I like the idea of a LH opener, then Priester. As long as if it's Quintana, he's still available to start in LA which should be no problem. IMO this is going to be a real tough series to win. They've won ten of their last eleven going back to the tail end of the regular season, and Muncy & Smith seem to have settled back in. But I do like the mojo of having handled them 6-0, having the home field, yet being able to (in a lot of minds at least) play the underdog card. Be loose & have fun with it.
  5. Yeah. the WS has gone 2-3-2 since way back before divisional play. No problem with that.
  6. Ty Schlagel is a 6'7" forward from Cretin-Durham Hall HS in the Twin Cities area. You could say he's following in the footsteps of a talented hoopster from the school in the early 70s, some kid named Molitor who later decided to emphasize a different sport. Schlagel is generally regarded as one of the top 2 or 3 HS juniors in Minnesota, and is being pursued by the B10 schools in that immediate footprint--UW, U of M, Iowa, Nebraska. What might give the Badgers a leg up is Brad Davison. It seems the two have worked out together & Schlagel is intrigued by Davison now being a member of the UW staff.
  7. I think at this point in time, colleges are a bit gun shy about flat out calling someone a GM, maybe because of the suggestion of professionalism (even though the professional aspect of it is now obvious). The UW basketball program also has someone performing GM duties.
  8. For awhile now I've seen Ortiz being panned on this board (not saying from you). I don't think some folks realize how little his contributions offensively need to be for him to be a more than acceptable everyday SS. As you said, close to last year wouldn't be a bad thing. At the same time, certainly you look for him to be pushed. Pratt would have first crack at doing that. You might be correct re Mitchell. But right now I just can't wrap myself around the combination of health issues & swing decisions getting to where they need to be. I will admit, after the way he closed out 2024 I started to feel some optimism. The shoulder issues may have permanently affected his throwing, but if he's at least acceptable in that regard I think people are really going to like what they see from Quero. Fischer advancing rapidly could happen. And if he takes to the OF, so could Adamczewski.
  9. Yeah, the "right now" paints an inaccurate picture. Still, this university doesn't have a storied history of wanting to pay large sums to a BB or FB guy to not coach while having to pony up for someone else. I see donors having to step up. With the nosedive we've experienced, I'd be real interested in seeing what schools might want to look his way.
  10. Yeah, for Kotelnicki to UW fans the PSU decision isn't good news. But PSU deciding he's their #1 isn't a slam dunk either. Stay tuned.
  11. The thing is, in a buyout you're talking about coming up with & spending the money right now. Not to mention you're paying a guy not to coach, along with whoever the replacement is. I'd love to see them be able to cut ties immediately but I think it would take quite a bit of contribution from the well-heeled alums & boosters & I don't see UW being able to roust up that kind of coin like an OSU or a Michigan could. Or apparently PSU. Of course you'd have to let a new coach decide on his staff, but Bostad as an OL guy sounds good to me. And I agree his assignment when here should've been OL, period.
  12. I'm in the middle with Leonhard. I think the folks who dismiss him as a HC candidate are remiss in doing so, but I see little evidence he'd be a slam dunk hire either. IMO a large part of his appeal would be the possibility of him attracting a solid, talented staff based on whatever contacts he's made at the different levels of his FB career. At either rate, I see VERY little if any chance he'd consider UW as long as Macintosh is still in place. I like Leipold. I just think the age might work against him at this time, with the program looking more & more to be heading into a total rebuild. And yeah, "boring" is in the eye of the beholder. I saw nothing boring about this program, or their identity in recent decades. And most, if not all of the successful programs have a strong element of running the ball & controlling the line of scrimmage in their profile. It's just that you don't see those elements highlighted on Sportscenter.
  13. After Michigan, I thought we might.......not match the physicality of Iowa, but be a little more pugnacious at home w/the Saturday night homecoming crowd. But it was a total mismatch up front. The challenge for opponents going forward might be to figure out how FEW they have to put in the box & still not have to worry about a running game. Not that it makes a difference in the outcomes, but they really seem to miss Zachman on the back end, too. The late-80s unis were painfully appropriate. I half expected Sean Wilson to come in off the bench to take a few snaps, roll out & gain a half yard.
  14. I really thought the move was to send Patrick out to warm up for the 8th, let them bring in the PH, then Koenig. Then Uribe. But this was OK, too. Savor the moment, everyone.
  15. Think I need to go party. First, a little ditty: "Hey Craig Counsell, whaddya say, Your next games' several months away"
  16. Good rundown. After competing pretty well from a physical standpoint last week until wearing down a bit, I think this is a good followup game. The biggest challenge remains trying to run the ball at least well enough to make Iowa honor it; otherwise they'll be relegated to bad down-and-distance & most likely won't have time to allow the longer patterns to develop. Maybe the most impressive thing they did last week was limit mistakes. That will have to continue in what I agree should be a low-scoring game. Maybe a sense of urgency too, in what the coaches would never admit publicly but what might be their best chance to win a game for awhile.
  17. As was Longo as an OC.
  18. I remember once reading about Yogi Berra talking to a young player about hitting. He started talking about his hands & his feet & this and that, and the kid got more & more confused. Finally Berra just walked into the cage & said "Ahh, just watch me do it". Carew is a great example. OTOH, while his philosophy would make todays' players cringe Charlie Lau was a very successful hitting coach with KC in the 70s after a thoroughly average career.
  19. The first time I heard the idea of #5 being a possibility I just shook my head. In a series-deciding game, at home, I don't care what has or hasn't happened in the last week, or the last few days. Selling off part of your season or partial-season pass to foot the bill is one thing. Today? I'd like to have a higher opinion of Brewer fans than that.
  20. He's definitely trying to go to RF. It's been a LONNNNG time since he's hit something hard to the pull side. His bat HAS been slow. Balls to the left side are jam shots & as you said, late on balls oppo. IMO he should keep the RF attitude but make better swing decisions. As to the article, I was 100% behind the bunt decision with Yelich & Chourio due up next, especially given how much time was left in the game. Tonite it might be different depending on the situation & who's available on the bench.
  21. OMG, I read @Frisbee Slider's post & immediately thought of that scene. Then three secs later I see this. Well done!!!!
  22. If it's close, you kind of have to hold someone back just in case. No ghost runner; you might have to cover 5-6 innings. We KNOW Megill is opening, we know Uribe can go more than one. I think you're right that Miz is going to work tonite, and if he's off Patrick might be next. But you have three LHPs available as well. Priester could also be the guy held back.
  23. You just KNEW there was going to be something surprising personnel-wise, where you could turn the roster inside-out, consider every possible idea, then something still happens that you didn't expect (at least I didn't). It makes sense as long as he throws strikes. You now have 3 LHPs available for later, and Uribe can certainly go more than one inning if needed. Either Patrick or Miz held back in case of extras?
  24. They'll still have Thielbar for later, but this is a pretty good point.
×
×
  • Create New...