Three significant things happened. They had people---primarily Mack---getting into the lane pretty much at will, getting fouled, and when not getting fouled making shots. Those weren't all layups either, a lot of 8-10 footers, comfortable takes because........
no one could help off the bigs. Bilodeau is just too good, and the 7'3" kid came in averaging a bit more than 4PPG, scored 22 & didn't miss a shot from the floor. That's one of those deals where he probably wasn't even a focus on the scouting report. A SR-year Nolan Winter could've been a big help tonite; one of those games where a lack of strength hurt. I wasn't nuts about our defense in the 1st half, but late I thought it was OK, they just beat it.
And thirteen TOs is too many, if UCLA is only going to have six & shoot just over 50%. The rebounding numbers where closer than I thought. It seemed worse due to some timely OREB from the home team.
44 Fouls called, 23 on us. I thought the whistles were too plentiful, but that went both ways.
It wasn't for lack of effort, but I thought Kamari McGee was sort of nondescript tonite, which is rare.
From the "expert analysis isn't always expert" department, UCLA was up 3 with 6.8 seconds left & had one more FT coming. The PBP guy mentioned the strategy of fouling if it stays a 3-pt lead, then mentioned how they go up 4 if the second FT is made. The analyst says "I'd foul either way". OK, boss...........