Every manager provides legitimate reasons for fans to criticize. The problem around here is that too many people like to critcize just about everything and really minimize those things that legitimately deserve criticism. You want to talk about empty arguments? According to many around here, mismanages the bullpen, puts the wrong play on at the wrong time, plays the wrong guys in the wrong spots, plays favorites, does nothing...really anything that someone can point to in order to pin a loss on him. Of course he does all those same things in the games they win, so I guess I'm a bit confused as well. The overwhelming majority of the time, the losses are "on Ned," yet I almost never here anyone say that a win is "on Ned." Strange. And other than providing a reason for guys like you to criticize him (which I am sure he is very concerned about), exactly what damage was done, either short- or long-term, by randomly deciding which guy would sit? (pared back long quote and combined consecutive posts --1992)