You may not consider him much of a prospect, but obviously other people differ. Why do you consider him a prospect? Rather than just throwing out ad hominem arguments, why don't you give reasons why he IS a prospect? The anti-Gwynn crowd has repeatedly given reasons why they don't think he is a strong prospect, including: no power, unproven ability to consitently draw walks, lackluster SB% in spite of speed, and a pretty unimpressive history of minor league offensive numbers in general If you don't agree with these assesments, debate them. Attempting to write off people who don't think highly of Gwynn as "haters" isn't really an argument, but still seems to be the argument of choice for many pro-Gwynn posters.