I know we've beaten to death the whole young player vs veteran player thing with Macha, but I'm struggling to understand why DM thought he was good choice in the first place, or why he tacked on that option for 2011. Macha is the first Brewer manager I"ve ever truly despised, he's just a horrible fit for a team that is always going to rely on young players to be successful. He just bungles everything, he tries to be sabermetric and takes it too far like completely eliminating the running game last season. He tries to do the right thing and play the most productive player while sitting our top prospect on the bench because he's in a zim-zam. If he's going to back Suppan, he damn well better back Narveson when he fights through 5IP without his best stuff. I find the whole quote trwi7 linked extremely frustrating. I agree 100% on the quote part, and I'm coming around to agree on your other points as well. When I read that last line “If you’re trying to make a team, I’d suggest you turn it up.” it really really made me angry. Here we're talking about a guy who has a 0.65 ERA this Spring and you're telling him to "turn it up"? I'm sorry, but that line really infuriated me, and I can't think of any reason why Macha would say it other than that he just loves his Vets and expects everything and more out of the younger and unproven guys.