Not to get too off topic, but I have a love/hate attitude towards Dibble. Sometimes he can be very entertaining, but other times his views are just oversimplistic. The other day he was talking about how baseball is not broken and he was basically against any further form of revenue sharing. Five minutes later he was talking about guys like Texiera, Sabatihia, Fielder, and even Mauer...stating that he doesn't blame (or would not blame) any guys like this for wanting to go play with a big market club that can afford to pay them and still be competitive instead of staying on a team that would have to pay them over a 1/4 of their total payroll and wouldn't have any money to build a lineup around them. I don't blame them either, but how can you say that and then also claim that baseball isn't broken? His argument against revenue sharing is that teams that are getting it are not using it. Other than 1 or 2 teams, I would like to see proof of this. Giving a small market team10, 20 or 30 million is not suddenly going to raise their payroll to $125 million, or even $100 million, or $90 million, or $80 million for that matter.