I think you could get a lot more value for Fielder than Davis, Saltalamacchia and a future Dave Bush. I'd also be leery about trading for one guy that can only play 1B (Davis) and a second guy who might only play first base down the road (Saltalamacchia) when we have our own guy (Gamel) who might have to be switched to first base if he doesn't make it at third, and if the outfield is full. Heck, the only thing really holding Gamel back is his defense. If you trade Fielder, maybe you just switch Gamel right away and get his bat in the lineup? If the Brewers trade Fielder, I'd be surprised if the main guy coming back was also a first baseman. I'd also be surprised if we traded for a fix at catcher. With Salome, Lucroy, Palmisano and Fryer all likely to see time at AA and above this year, it seems unlikely to me. More likely for me, it would be a third baseman or pitcher in trade for Fielder. As for Blalock, it's a pretty big risk to guarantee his option and hope he stays healthy and produces. Finally, Bill Hall mitigates the value of anyone else involved in the trade going from the Brewers to another team. Do we really want to lessen the value of Fielder, arguably our best trading chip? Hall is owed 15.7 mil for the next two years... we might only get a Davis and Saltalamacchia if we force the Rangers to take him.