Braun will never be 'exonerated' in the eyes of most people without the details coming out that 'clear' him. People will see him as getting off on a technicality. Is breaking the chain of evidence a 'technicality'? No. But to many people it is. Braun will have to address things in more depth if he expects to come across innocent of the charges. And innocent means he didn't take PEDs or testosterone. NOT that the process was messed up. Most people seem to agree that the process was mucked up - even a little (even MLB updated their handling policy to insure it's not an issue going forward). But a messed up process doesn't, in the eyes of most people, mean Braun didn't do anything wrong. What they are asking is 'How did the test come up positive? Explain that. And if you have an explanation, why didn't you put it to the arbitration committee?' I wish/hope/pray for Braunie that he can come out and actually say things that will address the questions. Is it tampering? Is there a reasonable scientific explanation? Do we really not know? He can start by explaining why his team argued his case the way they did. He can say that the handling of the samples was a huge issue here. With regard to the arbitration hearing, this single issue was what they used to dismiss the charges. Their team's job was to invalidate the test - and the simplest and easiest way to was dispute the chain of evidence. Thus, they took that approach. They did not need to dispute the results of the test since the broken chain of evidence makes the samples themselves invalid. That would answer the question as to why they only argued the chain of evidence line to the committee. Next, he would then have to talk about how the results got tainted. He'll then have to say something like, "The chain of evidence issue was all I needed to to argue with the arbitration panel. As for the test itself, we were fully prepared to argue how all the tests - not just mine - came up abnormally high." And then, at this point, offer some reasonable theories. In the end, he might have to say, 'We don't know exactly how it happened. But we had several theories. All of which could have caused the tests to come up wrong." That will get Braunie cleared in the eyes of many (certainly not in some opinions). Will it ever happen? I don't know. Braun's refusal to talk about it hurts him, because people think he has something to hide. He's taking the high road - citing the confidentiality of the matter - but many, whether fair or not, just see that as an excuse. In the case of many players, the PED label has faded. A-Rod for instance. I wonder if he thinks time will simply force some to forget/not care. Perhaps he's right.