The final sentence is exactly why Hader will remain the closer. Even if stats show that Hader is best used in the role he had in 2018, if he were moved out of the closer role, he would get upset and the union would file a grievance because it would cost him a lot of money. Right or wrong, closers make a lot more than multi-inning middle relievers, and the Brewers would be the "bad guys" if they take him out of that role. Plus, Hader can blow saves and people will shake it off. If he were replaced, every time someone blew a save it would be all anyone would talk about. One of Counsell's strengths is the "loose atmosphere" in the clubhouse. This could lead to the opposite. The union wouldn't have a leg to stand on. They cannot dictate the role that the team feels Hader can best benefit the team and force them to let Hader pitch the 9th . If they signed Hader to a contract that included large incentives for saves with the understanding that he would be in that role, then that's a little different. If Hader were to come out and have a similar season to how he usually does in a fireman type role, and all his peripheral numbers are in line with how they have been, and the only difference is the lack of saves, then Hader should receive an arbitration raise in line with any other reliever of his caliber from his current salary to his 3rd year. If that didn't happen, that would absolutely expose the utter flaw with the antiquated arbitration system. The system should be changed to better reflect a more modern understanding of baseball statistics. Teams should not be forced to manage their rosters to cater to an antiquated system if they don't feel it helps them win the most games.