To an extent, I feel like this debate boils down to a philosophical question about which small market model is better: Twins vs. Marlins. If we're the Twins, we hold out hope this year and next and keep ourselves consistently strong, knowing that some years we'll dip, and other years we'll rise a little. If we're the Marlins, we sell and rebuild and hope that the rebuilding is good enough to make a WS. It has worked for the Marlins twice, but isn't working now so much. Mind you, they haven't gone out and hired a few FA's to fill some holes, but I'm guessing it's because they know they're more than a few FA's away. We have glaring holes on this team, and we have a lot of talent. If things go as planned for every team, the Cubs beat us to the title, as well as the Cardinals. But things rarely go as planned, so why not take a chance? Even if the general management decided we were better suited for the Marlins model, I don't know if right now is the time to do it. What 7/31 holds though is anybody's guess. I guess what I would hope for is that Doug Melvin could do something creative that might give us a chance this year, but strengthens us for the future. I'm not saying I'm a proponent of the Bucholz for Hardy idea (and we don't even know if that's possible), but a move like that may give us a boost for this year while investing in the future.