I think Bob Bradley did the bare minimum. The bar was set at getting out of the group stage. To do that the US needed 1) the English goalkeeper to commit a howler, 2) to overcome early malaise and deficits against inferior teams (to be fair officiating was not on the US' side). Either of those two things go differently and the US fails to get out of one of the easier groups in the cup. I don't like Bradley because he employs unnecessarily negative tactics agaisnt inferior teams and plays favorites in player selection. This team, at it's best, plays on the front foot (see second halves of Slovenia, Algeria). Yet every game Bradley plays two defensive midfielders centrally, even agaisnt CONCACAF minnows. For my second point I submit Ricardo Clark and Robbie Findley (also Sasha Kjlestian). Most importantly, in international soccer especially, if you're not moving forward, you're falling behind. Is Bob Bradley going to make this team better or is he entirely dependant upon the improving American talent?