I've intentionally avoided rehashing 4-5 years worth of debates regarding certain metrics with the usual suspects in this thread but I do have a couple of comments. I like stuff as much as anyone, and who has better raw stuff in MLB than Edwin Jackson? The problem is he's never been able to locate consistently, there are plenty of pitchers who never reach their full potential. We have a LHP on our DL that can hit 95 MPH... you can count those guys on one hand, and he didn't have success. There's much more to baseball than pure statistical analysis. I love to talk about peripherals, in fact on the minor league forum you'll see me posting about raw stuff and peripherals all the time, but at some point the actual results have to count for something. If you look at Greinke's career as a whole, what year is the outlier? Greinke's fantastic K rate this season has relatively little to do with his FB location, he's getting those Ks off his secondary pitches. The poorly located FBs and the occasional hanging slider are the pitches that are getting rocked. You will find an occassional pitcher's pitch that is hit for a HR, or some lucky garbage like golfing one out off of one knee, but those are events that happen a couple of times a season, they are extremely rare. How many hitters do the Brewer's have that can hit a pitcher's pitch consistently? I'll submit there's 1... Braun. Morgan has slapped a couple of hit of hits on them as well, but I haven't seen enough to make a judgement about him yet. Everyone else on the team is a mistake/fastball hitter. If people refuse to believe that pitching is all about location (which includes pitch selection), then there really isn't anything to discuss ever. The game isn't played in metrics, there is no "cause" in any metric, they only measure results. In baseball the power lies with the pitchers and by extension the cause mostly rests in their ability to execute a given pitch. If less than 50% of HRs can be classified, then GB, LD, and FB% are all pretty meaningless aren't they? If we can't classify what happens on the best possible outcome for a hitter, how can we classify the rest? Wait that's right, we don't care about HRs because BABIP doesn't include them in the calculation. We've reached a stagnant place where a poster can't say a player has done X over Y number of games without the same tired stastical analysis regarding sample size, sometimes being horrible or good over a small stretch is the point of the discussion. Something causes those stretches other than luck, I'd love to see many of you coach... don't worry about it son, your BABIP is just low, you'll be fine, the hitch in your switch has nothing to do with it.