Peavy, Jackson, Sarfate, etc... these guys aren't top pitching prospects. What major league team would be foolish enough to trade a Buehrle or someone similar for AAA relievers and an AAA starter with an ERA over 4? You're talking about trading away an Inman, Jeffress, or both for that type of player. The Red Sox wouldn't even make a deal like that with the White Sox because the White Sox apparently wanted the 2 top starting pitching prospects in the organization. Melvin got Cappy for Sexson (Wickman Deal), Bush for Overbay (Sexson Deal), Vargas for Davis (scrap heap pickup). Melvin has done an amazing job getting something out of nothing, but are the Brewers in position to continue to make those sort of scrap heap pickups for starters? Would Melvin trade one of our best position players to aquire more pitching at the deadline? Wouldn't that be shooting ourselves in the foot? The only free agent aquisition on the staff is Suppan, who's arguably been the worst starter of the 5. Essentially what your saying is trade away the closest young pitcher or 2 to the majors, for a 2 month rental, with no way to fill the gap with a player of similar talent in house, or without the availability of filling that void via free agency in the off season. What top of the rotation college arm would fall past the first 20 slots regardless of signability? Has it happened in the last 10 years? I have a hard time saying that a hypothetical highschool draft pick would make it to the majors in 3 years. That's a best case scenario, and by far the exception to the rule. Even if they do make in 3 years, their arms aren't ready for a 200+ inning season, so they won't be able to pitch in the rotation anyway. Saying that a drafted pitcher could have the success of Yo is like people who suggest that Yo could make the 200 inning jump this year because Verlander did. We'd be counting on the exception to the rule, instead of the rule itself. To me it's just not feasible to plan your roster based on best case scenarios, I'd much rather go the other way and plan my roster around the worst case. Then you can trade any MLB surplus you have, just like Oakland has done. Not that Oakland is my model of how the Brewers should run their franchise, but they've handled their young pitching about as well as could possibly be expected. Since I'm against doing any deal for a rental starting pitcher, there's no way I'm giving up anything valuable for a relief pitcher either. Again, trading away a Jackson or Sarfate would be fine, leave the high ceiling top prospect starting pitchers alone.