You had the right to vote no as a tax payer, once the decision was made, you had no more rights, that's democracy. The stadium district represents you, the elected officials represent you, you have no power or leverage with any sports franchise. You either choose to support them, or you don't. I don't want to get into a sidebar arguement about entitlement, but fans aren't entitled to anything more than a GM's best effort. How you spend your money and time is entirely up to you. Would the Brewers have kept him 3 years ago? Will they resign him to a much larger contract this off season? It seems to me they sold high with Kolb, Sexson, Pods, and Lee. Furthermore, the Sexson trade was brilliant, and continues to pay benefits for the current MLB team. What trade the Pirates made has come close to the same level of production? The only difference between what the Pirates have done and what the Brewers have done is the Brewers selectively chose to keep 2 of their players, which last year looked like a pretty bad way to spend their money. How easy it is to forget when Jenkins was slumping horribly and Sheets was on the DL... The Pirates have had some bad luck, but if they aren't going to contend, what sense does it make to be buyers? Again, look at the Brewers 3 years ago, even 4 and 5 years ago, they were always sellers. To me, the Pirates are exactly where the Brewers were in 2001, 2002... that's why I bring up Brewer examples from the past. Nope it doesn't, but spending money doesn't automatically make you a winner, spending it wisely does. What have the Yankees won recently? The Redskins? The Cubs? Al already pointed out Baltimore, how many more examples do you want? We can go player by player if you like, but spending money doesn't mean anything in itself. The Pirates have had some bad luck mixed with some not so hot trades, that's the big difference. The Brewers were horribly unlucky last year with the injuries, and look where they ended up. Well since I have to spell it out for you... You take small sentence fragments and break them out in a quote, usually out of context. Instead of cherry picking, why not quote the entire paragraph or message that you are responding to so people can make their own judgements without having to go backup and reread what was previously posted. Exactly my point. It's one to thing to think it and another to post it. I find cherry picking fragments to be an absurd way to prove one's point. Or is it just that you don't like your own post being called absurd? I don't disagree that there comes a time when you will need to spend money to win. However, if you aren't ever in contention, what good does spending that money do? Create more debt to the franchise? What if the Pirates spend the money, still lose, and no fans come out to the ballpark? The debt that's incurred to run the franchise is a healthy thing? Call the Pirates fiscally irresponsible to the fan base if you want, I choose to see it a different way.