I'm going to respectfully disagree with all of this. I absolutely love instant replay and how it's been handled. #1 - While there may be a perception that umpires are old men, this has not been trending true over the past few years. Performance, health, physical fitness, and other reasons are why younger men are getting a chance to umpire in MLB without "paying their dues" and struggling to get into what used to be a good ol' boy system. This year, the ages of the umpires that were added to the 72-man exclusive fraternity were ages 29, 32, 32, 32, 36, 37, 37. I don't know the median age of umpires, but I do know that it has been decreasing for a number of years. #2 - Why is a replay umpire a real umpire? In what sport isn't the replay official, NOT an official? Is that a serious question? Maybe we should just put hand buzzers in every seat and let the fans vote on the replay as if they are sitting in on an America's Funniest Videos episode? I personally don't see any bias in favor of the field umpire simply because it's another umpire making the ruling from New York. I have seen plenty of calls that appear close to my naked eye getting overturned on replay. Questioning the integrity of that system just seems too conspiracy theory for me to take seriously. Additionally, views that you may have seen on your local tv feed might not have been feeds available to the official in New York making the call, so something that might seem obvious to you, might not been what the replay official was privy to seeing. #3 - How do we know that the replay ump NEEDS to know the ruling on the field. Maybe he is saying into the headset, "I can't tell, play stands as called", with the on field umpire signaling/confirming what the original call was?