If the Brewers lose a home series to a team they have dominated for years, with Zach Greinke on the mound and with no result mattering other than the result they make for themselves, I'd say they don't deserve home field advantage. The NLDS has been played for 16 years. Since 1998, when the format was tweaked so that the higher seed had home-field advantage, the team with the home field has an 11-13 record in NLDS. In half of those 32 series, the loser has been swept. Seven of those 16 sweeps have been by the team without home field advantage. In all those 32 series, we've only seen a total of 4 Game 5's (all in a span from 2001 to 2004). All of the Game 5s have come in the seeded format and 3 of the 4 Game 5s have been lost by the home team. In light of these historical facts, maybe it's way more important how you play than where you play. It would be great to get home field advantage in this round for the fans. I tend to think it would be better for the team as well, but frankly, nobody really knows. In the end, if the Brewers want it, they can go out and get it without worrying about anybody else. The question is, given the historical experience in the NLDS era, is it really worth getting too excited about one way or the other?