Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Posted

The slugger hit just .189/.260/.344 in August, completely unable to square up the ball for long stretches. Even his “hot” July showed some considerable regress under the surface. Can the Brewers fix him before the playoffs?

Image courtesy of © benny sieu-usa today sports

For a hitter like Rhys Hoskins, who features a lot of power to the shorter fields on his pull side, expected statistics aren’t an ideal measurement of his prowess. However, compare him to his own production month-to-month (rather than league averages), and a very stark trend begins to show: Hoskins has just not squared the ball up with any consistency since coming back from the IL. Two key metrics for the quality of contact and output by Hoskins are his expected weighted on-base average and his expected slugging marks, both of which show a considerable decrease since his hamstring injury.

AD_4nXcK-FtlDMpwuM1vSsCMt7mq-_wxgeK9Z801

Hoskins is never going to hit for a high average. He's too slow, and he whiffs too much. No matter where or how hard it’s hit, Hoskins has almost no chance of legging out a single on a ball that's nabbed by an infielder. In addition to that, even balls pounded into a gap don’t guarantee him a double. Factoring in the amount of swing and miss and strikeouts in his game, in order to bring value, Hoskins has to be either walking a lot or crushing the ball when the pitcher errs.

These two can go hand-in-hand, in that if pitchers feel a hitter can hurt them, they’re more likely to nibble, and the likelihood of a walk rises. The freefall Hoskins has been in, however, has led them to be aggressive in the zone, especially attacking some gaping holes in his swing. As you can see in the table above, his xWOBA and his expected slugging have been in a sharp decline since he returned in June. This emphasizes just how fortunate the surface numbers in July were.

He’s a far cry from the Hoskins we saw pre-injury, with the high walk rates and slugging rates, so what’s changed?

Well, first off, Hoskins's long swing and modest bat speed require a very strong eye at the plate. He needs to recognize pitches much earlier than most hitters, to make high-quality contact. It’s a big reason why he talks a lot about swing decisions when things are going well for him, and also why he can chase some ludicrous pitches on occasion. I’d like to take things a little further in terms of the quality of his swing decisions and suggest he’s become a little too swing-happy, especially in areas where he struggles to create quality contact:

AD_4nXf3aFavdAcn7ajorjRei_51UF--u2f2Rc9v

Hoskins has an xWOBA of just .142 in 2024 when swinging down and away in the zone, yet he’s swinging 10 percentage points more often in this zone than he was earlier in the year. You might ask whether this is a factor of good sequencing, and him being forced to swing in two-strike counts. Instead, when you strip out those situations, the disparity grows. In April and May, he swung in that zone just 30% of the time with zero or one strike, whereas since the return in June, that number has skyrocketed to 52%.

His swing doesn’t have a lot of adjustability, and he struggles to even stretch the barrel of the bat to cover this zone--which makes it all the more perplexing how often he’s swinging at these pitches. Combine that with the heavy slider usage to that down-and-away location, a pitch Hoskins has a measly .313 OPS against from the start of June, and it begins to explain some of the issues he's had in recent months. In this three-month period, against the slider, Hoskins has one bloop double down the left-field line and one warning track flyball out to show any sign of pop. 

His bat speed has stayed consistent throughout the year, if not a little faster since returning from injury so it seems like the hamstring injury hasn’t affected him in this particular way. It has seemed to affect his comfort at the plate more, with a far less confident and patient approach.

Although I’ve dumped a little on his July numbers belying some of the underlying numbers, there’s a clear pattern in terms of his approach, and it feeds into his struggles down and away. One thing you pretty much can’t do with that pitch is attempt to pull it, and yet, look at Hoskins's  trends on a month-by-month basis:

AD_4nXdfii6-Hr_6Cq1YLuPzMQ6Bnor5tJtBhjEp

His best three months (ignoring March, for sample size reasons) have all come with comfort hitting to the opposite field. June and August, on the other hand, have been about as pull-heavy as you’ll see from any hitter. He has the raw power to torch balls out to center field, unlike the mold of an Isaac Paredes, and it should allow him to find the barrel with more consistency against all pitches. Perhaps that will play a big factor in whether he can rekindle some of his early-season heroics down the stretch. One thing’s for sure, the Brewers with a fully firing Rhys Hoskins are a truly fearsome lineup.

What do you think of Hoskins's struggles? Can you see a quick fix? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!


View full article

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think you pretty much nailed it in detail.

His limitations at bat are real.  His limitations in the field loom even larger.  I don't know what Hoskins can do to get his average up but he in the least should work on improving his on base percentage.

What I really can't understand is when you put both Hoskins and Bauers in the lineup Murph is often playing Hoskins at 1st base and DH'ing Bauers.  Makes absolutely zero sense.  I'd switch that every single time and pinch hit Bauers for Hoskins a whole lot more when Bauers isn't in the starting lineup. Why play the weaker of the two defensively ? 

  • Like 3
  • Love 1
Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Posted

No

7 minutes ago, Trax said:

I think you pretty much nailed it in detail.

His limitations at bat are real.  His limitations in the field loom even larger.  I don't know what Hoskins can do to get his average up but he in the least should work on improving his on base percentage.

What I really can't understand is when you put both Hoskins and Bauers in the lineup Murph is often playing Hoskins at 1st base and DH'ing Bauers.  Makes absolutely zero sense.  I'd switch that every single time and pinch hit Bauers for Hoskins a whole lot more when Bauers isn't in the starting lineup. Why play the weaker of the two defensively ? 

It seems perfect Jack Sterns questioning that this is more about being able to replace Bauer's with Sanchez in PH situations where they're uncertain about Sanchez and Monasterio at first base, and rightly so.

Whether that's as beneficial, who knows, but that's Murphy's reasoning.

Seeing him knock a breaking ball down in the zone out yesterday was a sight for sore eyes, but he also showed a lot of chase down and away still so a lot of work to be done there and on his overall selectivity at the plate

Posted

He's really been atrocious all year, and if that was a Vogelbach or a Tellez in there, he'd likely be gone already. Yeah the occasional homer is nice, but he offers basically no speed, below average defense, and we know about his bat. It's looking like a bad signing, but he may be able to dig deep and offer some playoff heroics and at this point, that's really all we can hope for. Seems to be a good teammate at any rate. It was a risk worth taking at the time, no doubt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...