The alternative view is that without mortgaging the future, we would have gone through a major wave of prospects (Fielder, Weeks, Braun, Hart, etc.) without winning anything Well I realize my response is something that's been discussed over and over (I considered not replying as I did for that very reason... guess I should've just let the majority opinion get repeated again), but there were not just the two options of trading for rental and/or expensive vets, or not trading at all. And I'm guessing most who read and post here also already know the responses to that will be that trades for young cost-controlled players are very rare. So not really anything new there to discuss, but I am surprised how many fans just accept the message that Melvin and Mark A. have completely revitalized the org. -- to me, objectively, I just don't see it. Yes, the postseasons have been fun, but at this point I would rather have a strong organization. And I agree that the biggest problem has been a lack of success not only in drafting but also development. But that problem ultimately falls at the feet of Melvin and Attanasio, since they're the two main shot-callers when it comes to the product on the field. So, in a pathetic attempt to bring myself back on topic here, I think moving Hart and pricier players like him before you're overpaying for a player's decline is essential for the Brewers to remain competitive.