I just hate adding - for $10+ million - an aging, bad fielding player who has missed significant time in 2 of the last 3 seasons. If it was a for a year or two, sure. But for three and four years - that's big risk. I definitely agree with your points here. However, what it made me think of was all of the hypothetical discussions BF.netters have had over the past ~5 seasons regarding Fielder & his defense. The line that was always thrown around was something like, 'Yes, Prince's offense is amazing, but his defense really cuts into his value. You can find corner IF bats that won't be huge overall drops-off from Fielder's net production' -- well, here's one tangible example of that. In terms of just a season-to-season analysis, Ramirez's offense shouldn't be expected to be that much worse than Fielder's, given that he can play a passable 3B & probably a decent 1B. Obviously A-Ram's age is where the concerns & projected gaps in production would come from. Now I don't mean to start any debate about whether or not Ramirez is more valuable than Prince, or that the Brewers should sign him for any more than two or three seasons. But this just stands out as a real-world instance of that hypothetical that was discussed time & time again about the Brewers' life after Fielder. I just find it interesting.