Hindsight is just so 20/20 for all of you guys. You think because the Jays took the risk of putting him at 3rd and it worked, that the Brewers made a huge mistake not doing it. Or you could say the Jays evaluated his skillset correctly & helped develop him on defense. It's not about intangibles as much as it is... tangibles. And obviously Lawrie's tools translate alright to 3B, although I'm not sure if he'll ever really be an asset on defense. I don't think the Brewers made a mistake in trading Lawrie, but I do think they made a mistake in only getting a player in return who was/is under contract for two seasons. Anyone in the Brewers system in the past 10 years that has had a "position crisis" has been one of those all-bat no glove players as I mentioned. Weeks, Fielder, Braun, Gamel, Lawrie, etc. I don't believe that's the Brewers fault It's their fault for drafting bat-only or bat-first players, scouting & evaluating the players' defensive abilities/potential incorrectly, or for not helping develop the player(s) into solid defenders. But I use "fault" a bit lightly, as I don't see anything wrong with drafting good bats like the guys you listed. Plus, Weeks & Braun have developed pretty well on defense. And I see your larger point that the player himself is the one who has to ultimately do the improving (see Weeks & Braun). But the Brewers have clearly done all or at least some of the things I listed to start this paragraph. The drafting philosophy has been clear: draft the bat, worry about the rest later.