I'm ok with including a MLB-ready prospect or young player with lots of team control in a trade for a rental the caliber of Machado - provided that prospect is essentially blocked by better options at his best position that were under team control for multiple seasons. That description fit LaPorta to a T when he headlined the Brewers' trade to bring in CC. Phillips won't ever start over Cain or Yelich, and his bat isn't good enough to take over everyday RF duties as long as the Brewers have other veteran corner OF options around. Plus as others have mentioned, there are a pile of younger OF prospects right behind Phillips in the organization. So I'd be fine with trading "the laugh" and wishing him well. I'd hesitate to move Arcia this year - I think he deserves the chance to earn his everyday SS job back next year (if not sooner), and he's a great option to provide stellar defense at a very low cost for a few seasons until some of the other SS prospects at lower levels work their way up. Unless he really turns a corner, I don't feel like Arcia would be an extension candidate - i.e. someone the Brewers value as a franchise cornerstone. The potential pitchers that would be included might be Woodruff, Ortiz, Modeiros, Brown, etc....if I'm Stearns I limit that potential pitchers list to those that are either already on the 40 man or who would need to be put on it to avoid losing them to the Rule 5 draft. Then you trust your internal scouting to tell which of those pitchers have the least upside over their remaining years of control, and pick that one to add to the package. When you look at what the Brewers have in the minor leagues in terms of pitching, the depth is actually quite impressive and frankly they aren't going to be able to keep all of them in the organization longterm.