I don't call BJ a 'miss'. He had a long, very servicable career. 2300 hits, 34 WAR, 1100 RBI. He wasn't a superstar, but he was good enough to hang around 19 years and compile a good (not great) war. Was he worthy of a #1 pick? No, probably not, but a lot of #1 picks don't even stick for 5 years. I was always a Surhoff fan. I think we could go all day on prospects that never scratched the big leagues, so maybe I read the OP wrong. I picked BJ not because he was a bust, not at all, but because he never was a true star like most everyone assumed he would become. As I mentioned, I was a huge fan of his. However, his time with Milwaukee, in particular, was pretty meh. Then, there is this list: http://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?draft_type=junreg&query_type=year_round&draft_round=1&year_ID=1985 Well, there's four guys on that list that ended up with a higher career WAR than Surhoff. Bonds (jerk), Palmeiro (cheater, liar), Larkin (HOF), and Will Clark. I still don't call Surhoff a "miss". Gregg Jefferies is further down that list in the first round, and he was supposed to be 'can't miss', and he wasn't a flame out (he played like 15 years, but had a few decent years, and was about as close to average as a guy can be. To me, BJ is like Rickie Weeks. He's a serviceable/decent ballplayer who gets scrutinized because of expectations. He didn't live up to the hype, so he's labelled a bust/letdown. BJ was a good ballplayer who wasn't worthy of being a number one pick.