Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

DuWayne Steurer

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
  • Posts

    11,848
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Milwaukee Brewers News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospect Rankings

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Milwaukee Brewers Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Milwaukee Brewers Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by DuWayne Steurer

  1. I'm not. I already knew Roenicke was stupid. We don't need Garza being hurt. He's been pretty darn good for the last 2 months +. Losing him for any period of time at all will be a killer.
  2. Gomez needs a few days off. I know the whole "let me swing really hard thing" has lead to a good couple years for him, but he's struggling bad right now.
  3. Garza seems like a gamer (I could be wrong.....). Just seems like if something was wrong, it had to be something really wrong for him to say something vocal enough for them to take him out of the game. All conjecture of course. Nobody knows what's going on. Maybe it's a blister, maybe it's the mysterious 'pulled quad' that's bothering half the guys on the team. Maybe it's just that RRR is actually as much an idiot that we think him to be.
  4. Neshek has a seriously ugly beard. Seriously. This trend with guys in baseball with these ugly mountain man beards is horrible.
  5. So Lohse is left in to give up nine runs....... Garza is pulled at 71 pitches, and no runs allowed after 6 innings. Garza absolutely better be injured or Roenicke's stupid.
  6. I like how Garza played up acting super pissed off there, like he didn't want to get up and in on Adams. Garza seems like the type of guy who will "get one back" for a teammate without waiting for the manager to order it. Of course I don't condone this, but Garza just seems like that kind of guy. 1-2 count to a lead off hitter probably not the time to "get one back". Agree that Garza wouldn't hesitate to do it, just don't think that was the time to put someone on. I don't think he was TRYING to hit him.... I just think he was definitely trying to get up and in, and well.....if he hits him, well, oh well.
  7. I like how Garza played up acting super pissed off there, like he didn't want to get up and in on Adams. Garza seems like the type of guy who will "get one back" for a teammate without waiting for the manager to order it. Of course I don't condone this, but Garza just seems like that kind of guy.
  8. Im watching on gamecast. Is there some reason that lohse is still in this game that I cant see? Isnt this what estrada is for now???
  9. Ok, so tomorrow, we're up 10 - 1, and you bring in Kintzler, who drills Holliday. What have you proven? I want to know what tangible point have we proven? That we'll play tit for tat? You know how this goes. You KNOW that this will NOT result in the Cardinals ceasing to hit batters or pitch inside, so I'm asking, not sarcastically, what tangible benefit the scenario you're laying out will provide. That if you continue to risk injuring our players by throwing up and in, you risk your players getting injured in retaliation. If they were hitting him with breaking balls in the thigh and back I wouldn't have the issue of retaliating. But they,re coming in and high. Retaliating feels like the only thing you can do. Not reacting hasn't stopped it. Scoring Gomez hasn't stopped it. So, I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, but that is not a benefit to the Brewers. Do you believe that this will put an end to the Cardinals hitting Brewers batters? That's what I'm asking, and no one will say "yes, I think hitting Holliday/Adams in the back of the hand and risking injury will actually change the way the Cardinals play". That's what I'm asking, and no one will actually affirm that. (I suspect because nobody believes it to be true). So again, what actual BENEFIT will we get? Will they stop throwing at Gomez? No. So what have you gained? Except maybe a suspension, and a further beanball war?
  10. Ok, so tomorrow, we're up 10 - 1, and you bring in Kintzler, who drills Holliday. What have you proven? I want to know what tangible point have we proven? That we'll play tit for tat? You know how this goes. You KNOW that this will NOT result in the Cardinals ceasing to hit batters or pitch inside, so I'm asking, not sarcastically, what tangible benefit the scenario you're laying out will provide.
  11. Gomez has been hit by Cardinal pitching in the last 4 games against them. Whether or not you agree with payback, this is not an acceptable trend, and it needs to be addressed. Whether that means retaliation or addressing it to the league is not up to me, but it needs to be addressed. Ok, retaliate. Hit a guy. HEre is my question, and no one will ever answer it. Do you believe that it will make the Cardinals stop hitting batters? WHich is the stated purpose, yes? Why else are you giving a free base runner?
  12. Not gonna happen. RRR doesn't get involved in that stuff. I understand it and respect it. But this Gomez stuff is ticking me off. Maybe they're trying to egg brewers/Gomez into doing something dumb. Just don't want to see GoGo get hurt. The idea here is that "plunking Holliday will make the Cardinals stop doing this" That's the fallacy in the idea. Because the Cardinals will never stop playing this way as long as they have a LaRussa progeny (Matheny) at the helm. The only way to get the payback is to drive that runner in. We did that. Payback acquired.
  13. If we hold on and win this game, we are guaranteed to leave St. Louis in 1st place....
  14. I can't wait for a time......10 years from now, 20, 50, I don't care when, but when Matheny is gone, all of LaRussa's progeny are gone, and this way of playing, and this "Cardinal Way" crap is a thing of the past. This idiocy doesn't have to be the way the game is played.
×
×
  • Create New...