I actually liked the Bleacher Report article. It's pretty balanced. The author makes a good point about fans knowing the name of everyone in the Mitchell Report, but being unaware of all the MLB players arrested for OWI. The tweets were a little over the top. This must have been more than seven years ago because WI Supreme Court case Village of Cross Plains vs. Haanstad http://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21382 gave a clearer definition of what operating a motor vehicle was. In that case, Haanstad was intoxicated and seated behind the wheel of a running car. She did not start the car, and there were witnesses who confirmed this. Her feet were swung over to the passenger seat. The courts decided since she did not manipulate or activate any controls necessary to put the vehicle in motion, she did not operate and her conviction was overturned. If that's the entire story, that truly does suck for your classmate. Any chance he started the vehicle and left it running with the heat on? If so, that counts as operation. However, you would think an officer would show some discretion since the guy was sleeping in the back of the van and not sleeping/passed out behind the wheel. Here in Wisconsin, the violation has to occur in/on a motor vehicle. A motor vehicle is any vehicle that is self-propelled. There are special exemptions for vehicles that operate on rails, snowmobiles, and ATVs, however. If you went to high school here in Wisconsin, the officer didn't know what he was talking about.