If you have two earners making $16 an hour in a household, you make enough to save. Now if you are a single parent, that would be a problem obviously. That's barely above median household income. It's $66k per year, which is not even close to the inflation adjusted salary for a comparable job 40 years ago. It can be done with a frugal lifestyle, but that wasn't my point. Two children in daycare can cost upwards of $2k a month. And we haven't touched the potential of having a student loan. The point was that it was far easier to have an average life in the past. My dad has friends who paid for UW by working at a bowling alley in the summer. I'm a conservative and well above median income but it annoys me when people explain our economic state with one liners about people today being lazy or buying too much stuff. It's simplistic and lazy and ignores the vast issues we have in our economy. I think you are right in some respects (education costs have far outpaced inflation, and housing costs have skyrocketed) but you could also argue it was easier to live an average life in the past BECAUSE our parents/grandparents were more frugal (sometimes by choice and sometimes just because they didn't have another option). Homes are way bigger than they used to be. Average size of a new home in 1979 was 1760 sq ft. In 2014 it was 2657 sq ft. People spend between $100 - $200 on cable tv, cellphone bills are $50 - $100, high speed internet is also $50 - $100 a month. Back in the 80's there were no such things. You paid like $13 a month for cable if you even had it, and you waited until after 7pm to make a long distance call because it was cheaper. People didn't go out to eat anywhere near as often as they do now. That was a weekend thing. So I agree that yes there are economic pressures that didn't exist 30 years ago but there are also cultural changes that have taken place that add to the burden.