endaround, Is K/9 inning more important than WHIP, ERA, K/BB ratio and Winning percentage? Garcia has the edge on Davis in all those categories both career wise and in 2006, by a fairly wide margin. He also had a better OPS against vs. Davis in 06 and career wise and a better BAA career wise. The only other stat Davis had the edge in 06 was BAA, by one point, .266 for Davis to .267 for Garcia. In 2007, Garcia was 17-9, 4.53 ERA, 1.28 WHIP, 2.81 K/BB. That was facing the AL with no pitchers batting. Davis was 11-11, 4.91 ERA, 1.51 WHIP, 1.55 K/BB. That was pitching in the weak NL with pitchers batting. How can anyone objectively say Davis is the pitcher Garcia is? Even Davis' supposed value as innings eater has been surpassed by Garcia who has pitched over 200 innings every year since 2001 and more than Davis in each of those seasons. By the way, heard this tidbit on Chicago radio over the weekend. Garcia pitched through a lengthy period this year with a tired arm due to the nearly 250 innings pitched in 2005 and time spent in World Baseball Classic. His arm was feeling much better down the stretch when he was nearly unhittable in the month of September. Doug Davis has a better K/9 inning career ratio than Warren Spahn. Does that make Davis better than Spahn? I don't think so.