Tom Oates wrote this in the July 1 Wisconsin State Journal regarding why he feels the Brewers wouldn't be able to trade for Sabathia. I read it and thought it wasn't that well thought out. First, Cleveland might not deal him. OK, granted this was written two days ago, but Cleveland has the second worst record in the AL, are last in the Central and are 12 games back of Chicago. Looks like selling time to me. Second, the Brewers aren't the only contender sniffing around for pitching help. True, but can other contenders put together the same kind of package that the Brewers can? He mentions Boston, Philly, Chicago, the Dodgers, the Yankees and Tampa Bay as other suitors. In all reality, TB is the only one that could put together the same kind of package, but they have very good starting pitching and will probably fill from within with David Price at some point. Third, the Brewers might be priced out of the market. Oates says that C.C. would net a larger return if the team trading for him signs him to a contract. Sabathia, if I'm right, doesn't have a no-trade clause, so why would the team have to agree to a new contract? He has no leverage to force them to. Besides, why wouldn't he test the market? He'd make more with more teams competing for his services without trading prospects. Also, just because he would sign a contract doesn't mean the price would go up, look at the Johan Santana trade. Not only that, even the last part of his $11 million salary for this year shouldn't be an issue because Attanasio said there is the flexibility for it. Finally, Brewers general manager Doug Melvin might not be willing to give up what Cleveland wants in return. I guess there's no way to prove this, other than Melvin saying that if help was available, he wouldn't hesitate to do it for the right price. I don't know why I felt compelled to comment on this, it just seemed hastily thrown together and not well thought out.