I want to know why seemingly everyone in this thread assumes the Brewers could basically take the Cubs revenue for themselves? I'm fairly certain that MLB would broker a deal that covers the cost of stadium use, staff, food etc. but the dollars above that would go to the Cubs as that would be the revenue they would normally generate in their stadium. By covering the excess costs in having 81 more games in Miller Park, the Cubs would then become the de facto landlord for those dates and take the revenue generated. The community at large would feel a major impact in restaurant, retail, and hotel/housing business and that can't be understated. MLB would not allow one club to gouge another in this situation.