Sorry, but that doesn't check out. Interest rates are at historic lows, and have been for some time. I think nodakfan is saying that they can charge higher interest rates on the loans they provide therefore they are ok lending to people who wouldn't have qualified back in the day. Thanks, homer. Yeah, it’s not so much about the level of interest rates (pretty low since 2009), but rather the difference between the market rate and what banks actually charge. Hypothetically, let’s say banks were once limited to charging a maximum of 2% above the market rate for auto loans. They had to stick to well-qualified buyers because they couldn't afford to lose any of the principal. Today, without a cap, banks have a little more leeway. For example, they might be able to lend to a recent college grad at 3% above the market rate. 50 years ago, this person may not have qualified for an auto loan. The default rate for this type of borrower may be higher than the typical well-qualified buyer from 50 years ago, but the bank is compensated for the extra risk in the form of higher interest (collecting 3% above the market rate instead of 2%). Generally speaking, providing credit to a broad range of people is a good thing. However, it has created issues for some folks who have overextended themselves.