Draft picks are so overvalued, it's comical. The concept makes sense, you want the asset that lets you acquire talent cheaply for 3 years. However the Packers draft guys who don't play for 2 of those years or just never amount to much. When teams gauge the value of draft picks it seems to go completely out the window that most of them do nothing in the league. And exchanging that asset for a known commodity that has shown he can actually play doesn't seem to have any value.
You'd have been 100% better with Logan Wilson at the time Ty'Ron Hopper was drafted. There should be much more willingness to trade those kinds of picks for players, for teams on the cusp of titles, if you're taking reach players like that who amount to nothing. And yes, I understand you can't predict the future, but the picks are treated like a sure thing that they aren't. And again, yes, I understand it's potential-based. But IMO the high probability of failure is just cast aside in an illogical way.