You can't not play players to avoid paying options/bonuses and it wasn't just save opp., it was finishing out games. If K-Rod could prove the Brewers were going with a lesser option in these situations (Saito would be a lesser option imo)........ really wouldn't be hard for him to win such a grievance. All he'd have to say is "Hey, who has the most saves in baseball over the past 5 season? ............ oh, me..... awesome, how many does Saito have? A handful............. hmmm, that is odd. He's not young either, so please Brewers organization, explain why you would go with a guy who is older, not signed for next season and has a fraction of the saves I have over the past 5 years and limited experience in closing games?" The point is it came with a lot of risk, you really think the Brewers were the only team the Mets called looking to do this? It was reported a few teams weren't interested or turned the Mets away - the team with the deepest pockets in the league were one of these teams(Yankees). Bottom line is, in a worse case scenario - and yes, I realize a lot would have had to happen to get to the worse case - the Brewers organization could have been hampered severely next year if the option vested and it would have made it fiscally difficult to resign Marcum/Greinke and would have all but guaranteed Prince's departure. It could have been a huge blow to the Brewers and I think it gets overlooked by almost everyone. Agree to disagree, either way I don't see any point in continuing this because it doesn't even matter as: - Ax is kicking ass - K-Rod dropped the option