Here's one reason the triple crown argument should be used to justify giving the MVP to Cabrera over Trout: Let's say I view Cabrera as the most value player because of the triple crown, so I decide: Cabrera > Trout Now, what if Josh Hamilton had hit 45 HR's but otherwise had an identical season, so he'd clearly be far behind both Cabrera and Trout in terms of candidacy for the MVP. Then Cabrera wouldn't win the 3C and I wouldn't view him as the MVP (would anybody be making the Cabrera argument if he didn't win the MVP?). So if Hamilton just connected two more times, I'd be voting: Trout > Cabrera If you vote to give Cabrera the edge solely because of the 3C, that means that your relative ranking of Trout vs. Cabrera depends on Josh Hamilton. Why should Josh Hamilton's performance have any effect on how you rank Trout and Cabrera? It's really cool that Miguel Cabrera won the 3C this season, even if RBI's aren't a good measure of offensive performance, as it holds a major amount of historical significance and hasn't been done for decades. That's hardly sufficient to justify giving him the MVP over Trout, who was the better player this season.