What a crazy idea? Just put the fielders where the ball is most likely to be hit instead of equally spacing them apart on the field. The article wasn't about the use of the shift per se, but about what players, with what skill sets are in the shifted positions. The basic alignment was not anything required by rules, it was done to have the best chance of infielders getting to balls. It wasn't always that way, in the beginning first baseman played very close to the bag, then one team figured you could get more balls by moving him over and having the pitcher cover first on balls hit to the right side. The thing about the standard layout is that it requires players with certain preferred skills 2b and SS are fast / rangy with SS having a strong arm. First and 3rd need quick reactions, but need not necessarily be fast and cover ground. The new paradigm the Brewers are using is saying you not only don't have to put players in the traditional place, you don't have to have the traditional skill sets if your spray charts are good enough. Will it work? Will the defense still be saving a lot of runs? We have two months to get an idea. I get that and I think it's amazingly progressive thinking. If you're putting fielders where the ball is most likely to be hit the only real skill that a fielder needs is fielding the ball and making an accurate throw. Basically the bare minimum of skills. In theory, shifting makes range irrelevant, especially with a lefty shift. The player nearest the traditional short stop position is the only one who should be making a play to his right and most likely it's going to be a hit anyway.