But which data is actual? You can find data to suit your views, the information is so vast, there is just no way of knowing which data is factual, which data is agenda driven and which data is nonsense. This is so the truth. There's a great interview with Pete Townshend of The Who (well, just about all of his interviews are great) and he was asked about Greta and climate change. He's very much a lefty, progressive, whatever you want to call it and a big proponent of efforts to fight climate change but he says (and I'm paraphrasing) "She says just look at the science. I want to see the science. But I can't just go to google and type in show me the science and get all the same science. You get a wide variety of science. How am I supposed to know what is the right science?" I agree with trust your instinct when confronted with conflicting information but my instinct and your instinct and the guy in the corner's instinct are very likely to all be different. Of course it's easy to just fall back on politics as the reason a person thinks or feels a way about something but that's just a lazy way out and then we end putting everyone into one of two boxes when the majority of people truly would fit into neither. And so we wind up in a country like we are now where anyone who disagrees with me is an idiot who's just parroting the talking points of the political party I don't like.