HiAndTight

I am sure you are right, his "entire game" was a bad choice of words when I really just meant he is a declining player who has always gambled to get that first step. I didn't see that much of the Atlanta game. Well....I did not realize he was 32. I thought he and Hunter were closer in age. I DID see reasonable Vikings fans say that Hunter has more upside than anyone in the NFL at DE. Seriously. More than Myles Garrett, the best player on the team that got the most pub in the off-season the Browns. Better than Clowney who's not actually playing his natural position as a 4-3 end. I guess it HAS to be limited to 43 ends because if you throw in OLB'ers or 3-4 ends like Donald, Watt, Mack, it gets more ridiculous and this guy wasn't a total homer. Anyway, I demand at least an opinion on my "trade for Minkah Fitzpatrick trade idea. I thought i was dropping a gem. A brilliant idea. Trade for a guy we'd have taken last year ahead of Alexander who can play Corner, Safety and is the perfect mix with Pettine. I feel like Bill Burr screaming in my head, "give me something here, c'mon..." Though...I guess if nobody has replied, then people aren't excited.

Two more things. 1st-Anyone notice that on that TD pass to Jimmy Graham the Bears had a 12 man on the field penalty. So that was a free play. Kinda looked like he threw it up but did not see the call on the TV broadcast. 2nd-Just a write up on the perfect destinations for Fitzpatrick. Green Bay Packers Green Bay might seem like an odd candidate considering they're less than a year removed from trading their own young safety, Ha Ha Clinton-Dix, and are fresh off a promising performance from their young defense -- with up-and-comer Jaire Alexander headlining the CB room. But Mike Pettine is about the best coordinator you could find for Fitzpatrick, specializing in nickel and dime packages that could position the Dolphins standout as either a slot CB or third safety, the same kind of roles he'd find somewhere like Philly. Couple that with the fact the Packers may very well have drafted Fitzpatrick if not for Miami swiping him in 2018, and this is another example of a feasible match between a rising star and a team with big eyes for a playoff run.

I'm kinda amazed at the prices people think the Brewers should invest into Yelich who has 3 years of team control, missed time because of his back and just fractured his kneecap. And these are "team friendly" deals. You're talking about a Cy Young caliber pitcher entering Free Agency, a player I've been told we'd never be able to sign as a franchise.

The Brewers had no chance of resigning Fielder. Resigning Yelich can't be completely ruled out. The difference? Fielder was a Boras client and determined to get to FA. Yelich has already signed one long term team friendly deal so another can't be ruled out. Now the Brewers will have offer something like 5 additional years for $150-175 million, which would likely be an overpay for the last couple years, but Braun's last couple were overpays too yet I don't think they are that big of a deal. This Boars thing is just so overplayed. It assumes the players are controlled by Scott Boras. Boars clients have signed pre-arby deals. He is an agent, he acts at the behest of his players. I have to say, I'm really failing to see how a 5 year 175 million dollar extension for Yelich, who's 3 years away from Free Agency would fit any plausible definition of "team friendly." 35 million from age 31-36 is team friendly for...maybe Trout. I don't even want to think about what a player friendly deal would be to you. But here's where I really get confused. You even say that this team friendly deal over 5 years would be an "overpay." Ok...then what's the point? You have him for 3 years still(after this year of course). So taken literally, you think 3 of those years will be good and then 2 will be overpaid. That makes zero sense for the Brewers. Take that money, offer it to Gerrit Cole and try to win a World Series now. That seems more logical than giving a guy a massive extension through his mid 30's when you already have 3 years of team control.

Griffen's entire game is pretty much now just guessing the snap, great chance to get some free plays but not if you run the clock down to :01. One thing that worries me after the Bear game is the holding penalties. I remember seeing the announcement that the NFL was cracking down on it scroll across the bottom of the screen on ESPN and right away thought Bak and his outside technique was going to get hammered early in the season, sort of like Clay's "late" hits last year. Those are drive killers this offense can't overcome right now. The Packers played 6 DB's almost the entire game last week and the Bears threw 45 times. If we can stop the run playing that way all year this defense is going to have a big season, but it's possible the Bears just screwed up on their play calling. This should be a big test, the Vikings have good skill players but a crappy line. I think you're vastly underestimating what he can still do. He absolutely blew past Matthews last week, a pretty solid LT with some spin moves and speed rushes where Matthews barely got a finger on him. If they go back to that 5 man front look and Taylor has to fan out, Griffen is going to kill him with that inside move. As for Bakh, I'm not really worried. He's plenty talented enough to change it up and he was going up against some power rushers last week. What I'm worried about is that back injury keeping him out or making him less effective as I have zero confidence in Billy Turner sliding out to LT.

Griffen's entire game is pretty much now just guessing the snap, great chance to get some free plays but not if you run the clock down to :01. One thing that worries me after the Bear game is the holding penalties. I remember seeing the announcement that the NFL was cracking down on it scroll across the bottom of the screen on ESPN and right away thought Bak and his outside technique was going to get hammered early in the season, sort of like Clay's "late" hits last year. Those are drive killers this offense can't overcome right now. The Packers played 6 DB's almost the entire game last week and the Bears threw 45 times. If we can stop the run playing that way all year this defense is going to have a big season, but it's possible the Bears just screwed up on their play calling. This should be a big test, the Vikings have good skill players but a crappy line. I think you're vastly underestimating what he can still do. He absolutely blew past Matthews last week, a pretty solid LT with some spin moves and speed rushes where Matthews barely got a finger on him. If they go back to that 5 man front look and Taylor has to fan out, Griffen is going to kill him with that inside move. As for Bakh, I'm not really worried. He's plenty talented enough to change it up and he was going up against some power rushers last week. What I'm worried about is that back injury keeping him out or making him less effective as I have zero confidence in Billy Turner sliding out to LT.

If he ends up having a good season he's an easily tradable piece and could still end up on a team that faces the Bucks in a meaningful series. Meh, if we end up losing because of Joe Johnson, things will have gone horribly, horribly wrong this year. But....to your point, he is easily tradeable. So if injuries strike, the Bucks shouldn't have much trouble getting him. Though I suspect the Pistons will try to compete this year as they're good enough to be a fringe playoff team. Just the thought of being a Pistons fan right now makes me that much more grateful for Giannis.

He was supposed to be one of the next stud TE's for the Badgers. I'll be honest, I lost track of him. I now remember he transferred, but I think he was a 4 start out of Cali and we pulled him with a good QB(maybe Coan) and he was supposed to be a really good receiving threat. It was Austin Kafentzis, the dual threat QB out of Utah, and Gary Anderson's last recruiting class that Chryst had to try to save when he came in. Kafentzis saw the writing on the wall when Chryst came in, especially with Chryst bringing in his guy (Hornibrook). The only players who exhausted their eligibility from that 19 person class are Moorman, Shaw, Edwards (declared early), Sagapolu, Baun, Pfaff, Orr, and Ingold. Farrar, Penniston, Kafentzis, Booker, and Hornibrook transferred, and the rest retired due to injury or quit football (Dietzen, Estes, Thomas, James, Howe, Whalen). I honestly thought it was the kid from Utah(Or Houston), the kid who went everywhere trying to play QB and ended up at...BYU I think and is it playing WR'er, but that seemed like so long ago that I had to change it up. But man, that's a disappointing ending for him. He was getting playing time as a Freshmen I thought. He was supposed to be a real difference-maker as a pass 1st TE. I remember Anderson trying to convince the Badgers fans and the Boosters and....well, probably Barry most of all, but that's just a guess, that he was only going to add some spread concepts, but really, nothing would change. I didn't hear this at the time, but later I heard that UW was seriously considering firing Anderson and once he left, they said it'd take the program at least 3 years to un-do the damage he'd done. Out of every sport I follow in Wisconsin, UW Football is the one I'm most convinced has the right coach. That won't change if we go 8-5 this year or even worse, he's just steady, smart, reliable, invested in the area, played here, had success elsewhere. No question he is the guy for the next 10-15 years.

He was supposed to be one of the next stud TE's for the Badgers. I'll be honest, I lost track of him. I now remember he transferred, but I think he was a 4 start out of Cali and we pulled him with a good QB(maybe Coan) and he was supposed to be a really good receiving threat. Oh well. This isn't the pro's. You can move guys.

Well, two things. First, Minkah Fitzpatrick has gotten permission to ask for a trade. Now the Dolphins want a 1st(11th pick last year, he's like a Woodson type player that they're playing as an in the box type safety and he doesn't like how he's being used). He's a elite talent. I'd LOVE to see the Packers go after him. Just slot him into...well..the slot for the next 4 years and you've got an elite playmaker who can bring it off the edge, quick enough to cover the slot WR'er, good vs the run...though not nickel LB'er good as he's being used now. That's another blue-chip talent. But not for a 1st. I'd really do this for a 2nd and a future 4th? I wouldn't love it, but I think he can be a star and a ball hawk. So that could address your concerns about Pettine going up against more experienced QB's. That said, Rodgers has struggled against Cover 2 43 teams for years. From the Zimmer D's in Minny/Cincy, the Bills, the Lions. Those are basic looks and not all of those teams have had great talent(save maybe that one Buffalo team and the Vikes as of late). I think the key is just disguising the coverage long enough that you can get home before he realizes that they're...doing whatever. Bringing a corner from one side and rotating Savage over to help on that very side. Whatever it is. It's not just the DC, it's how long you disguise it. Rodgers, Brady, Brees(more than the 1st two IMO) have been stymied a bit in recent years by complex defenses. If our players don't give it away too early pre-snap, we should be ok. And if we can add another versatile, bigger, more athletic Tyrone Matthieu type player we'd had for nearly 4 full years and who I have zero doubt we'd have taken with our 1st last year had he fell, all the better. Of course, the Dolphins think they can get a kings ransom for him because they did for Tunsil and I'm sure some team thinks highly enough of him to give up a 1st.

Uhh, aside from the most important aspect being talent, scheming is entirely based on trying to disguise what you're intending to do. Nobody is telling 11 guys to go out there and wing it. Scheme can help cover up for talent deficiencies but it works even better when there are good players executing it. Not always. Seattle has a pretty basic defense. They just cover well and rush the QB. There's not a ton of deception. And some teams disguise much better than others. Can't argue with this. Seattle pretty much just lines up and plays. It's helped that they've had a HOF'er at Safety and MLB'er(and probably at CB) for long stretches. But yeah, they're just sitting there in a cover 2 and trying to fly to the ball and bring in fresh pass rushers.

Dodgers Braves Rays Twins Padres White Sox, that’s 6, all potential contenders in 2021. The Dodgers aren't giving up either one of Lux or May, let alone both of them. There isn't a single team that's going to give up four of their top 5 prospects to get Yelich, as good as he's been. That is a fantasy. It's just not even feasible. I know you've posted this idea in multiple threads, but there's not a single team in MLB that's going to give up their four top prospects to get one guy. We gave up 3 top 100 prospects including a top 10-15 prospect before he went on a 2 year MVP binge. But it's not feasible that a team could offer a similar package except add a 4th prospect who's got more value than Yamamoto? Also, why are we looking at prospects lists now in this hypothetical future debate?

Did you actually read my whole post? Or just blindly disagree? Where's the argument that Bellinger is the MVP? Yelich bests him in every comparison. High and medium leverage situations. Seasonal numbers. He's ahead in WAR on Fangraphs by 6/10 of a win. Belinger OPS'd 1.124 in the first half, and .902 in the second half. His OPS in the second half is 222 points lower than it was in the first half. Since August 1st, the last 37 games, he's hitting .231. He's hitting .219 with a .765 OPS In September. That's an MVP? Christian Yelich hit .345 in September, and OPS'd 1.237. His September OPS Is 472 freaking points higher than Cody Bellinger's. Bellinger's monumental collapse in the second half is offset by the fact that he's on one of the top two or three teams in all of baseball. Nothing about his play, of late, has been MVP caliber, and last I checked, MVP is based on a whole season. Yelich won it in the second half. Why on Earth could a guy hitting .231 the last quarter season not lose it? Don't just blindly say, "no". Make the case, if you can, which I doubt. Because there's no statistical justification for giving it to him. None. Why? You do realize this isn't a hypothetical discussion on this board. There are actual human beings voting for this award and you've already heard multiple writers who vote for the award talk about how this will take Yelich out of it. Even writers who had Yelich first despite Bellinger having an edge in WAR already.

I didn't know he got fined yet and I didn't think the league had actually said anything to him...but I can't say that with too much confidence as I just don't care enough to look. I thought it was people noticing the watch and then wondering if OBJ would get in trouble for it. I have noticed that the price of this watch keeps going up. It was 190K to start with and now it's up to 350K. So maybe the company should pay the fine! To me this is more the NFL. I remember them fining Urlacher 100K for wearing a Hat to a press conference or something years ago when he was the best defensive player in the league. I do think it's hilarious how OBJ is just sitting there whining about "why is everyone talking about me!" Shut up...it's what you live on.

The Packers would have to be huge favorites to win if they can win 2 out of 6 division games right out of the gate. Plus the Bears play the Rams and Saints while Minny has an even tougher schedule than us the next 5-6 weeks.

Yeah, Thielen could have hooked him, but even if he's not there, there's a good chance Cook beats him. Cook is a problem for teams. I am confident that Kenny Clark and company can get up field and slow that game down. What killed the Falcons was the turnovers and blocked punt. The Vikings were getting the ball on the Falcons 25 yard line every series. Cousins didn't even throw for 100 yards and their rookie 1st rounder was absolutely terrible. That OL can't pass block. We're gonna need King to come up big in that game along with Savage and Amos. But it'll definitely start up front, make Cousins beat you.

This is why guys like Davante Adams are worth their weight in gold. No drama, no diva issues. Just shows up and plays. Donald Driver was very similar, as was Greg Jennings until the end when he went off the rails. Jordy ... Cobb. The position tends to attract some pretty toxic egos. Packer fans should consider themselves lucky that they've avoided those types for the most part. Even Jennings didn't really do anything. It was his sister. It seems like the great WR'ers are just complete Diva's or they're really quiet. Lets not forget the Fitzgerald's, the Hopkins, Landry, Andre/Calvin Johnson, both of the studs in Minnesota right now, Julio Jones, AJ Green, JuJu, even OBJ at worst is flashy. Antonio Brown is just over the top and not even the outlier in Football, but in all of sports. I mean, just what he wrote in his texts...c'mon man.

You're totally conflating things here. OBJ is wearing an expensive watch, the same type Federer plays with while playing tennis. A high-high end fit bit essentially. What's wrong with that? Antonio Brown the day after the accusation; "You made me feel like a rapist." How does SHE make HIM feel that way? Though going off his text, I doubt he spelled any of those words right. He literally admitted in that text to assaulting her in a specific way while she was sleeping and laughed about it. Very different than OBJ wearing a watch during a game. Athletes in the NFL commit domestic violence at a lower rate than the general public. This is is just AB who's doing this. Also, she told Brown's chef the following day. His chef quit not long after and one chef is suing him(not sure if it's the same chef though).

It's like running a entertainment site and not talking about Charlie Sheen back when he was having his breakdown. I mean...you could just say don't talk about it. I'll respect it, but c'mon, have you ever seen a guy fall like this? From the greatest in his prime, arguably the best WR'er since Rice to a guy who might never play again. I do have to say, I find the way the lawyer released it to be a TINY bit manipulative. Something about how he met her at a Prayer group that she regularly attended and then he mentioned multiple times that she was watching a service on her Ipad. That said, she apparently told Brown's Chef what happened...which is what set Brown off with the texts out there and now his chef is suing him; https://www.clickorlando.com/news/florida-chef-antonio-brown-didnt-pay-bill-over-frozen-fish-head She also apparently told a former DA who dealt with sexual crimes, who suspected something was wrong(so goes the story thus far) who told recommended she get counselling and get a lawyer in case she ever wanted to move forward a while ago.

For real though, does this surprise anyone? I'm not a bit Steven A Smith fan....but I do love when he taunts Cowboys fans and says, "they're an accident waiting to happen." That should be in larger font and all caps, but you get the idea. That's what Brown is turning into. That this came out the night before he was supposed to practice with the Pats is...just perfect from a anti-Patriots, superficial POV. Far more serious issues here, but Brown is not a guy I'm pulling for.

Well they were doing it with Fant quite a bit. A glorified WR'er at this point. When he did have to block, it was ugly. But that's a good idea to switch it up, but a big concept of the zone stretch play is you get the whole defense going one way and that's where your cutback lanes are. Otherwise...it's just a stretch play. Anyway, as for the Vikes-Falcons game, Matt Ryan played so poorly, or maybe it was the OC who called just an awful game. The one thing that worries me a little from watching that game was they lined up Barr in sorta a 5-2 front. Anthony Barr came up and lined up outside Everson Griffen and one of the things that convinced him to come back to Minnesota last year was the promise that he'd rush the passer more. Well, when he came, Ryan had to get rid of the ball real quick. That type of pass rush would worry me not because of Barr, Bakh can shut him down, but Lane Taylor is going to have his hands full and I could easily see him getting replaced. The way he was thrown around one a few plays last year physically, then beaten with speed moves. This is going to be a really interesting game. The Vikings defense is similar to the Bears but worst by a little at every level, BUT they have an elite WR'er duo, a really good vet TE, an explosive RB....and a terrible OL. Their 1st round pick Bradbury was just awful last week. Packers are gonna need Kevin King to be able to play a bit more and Kenny Clark and the rest of that DL is gonna need to be destroying the Vikings OL.

Meh, Cubs ended up losing. Amazing how this team is just 1 game back. Even still...is ANYONE wishing right now that the Brewers would have made more aggressive trades at the deadline? I'm thrilled with how this team has played. Wouldn't it just be fitting that this is the team that actually wins the World Series?

Maybe if Coan was a Soph....but he is a junior. I can't really see Mertz leaving to sit out a year and start somewhere else. Might as well sit behind Coan again and stay in the same system. For some reason I don't see Coan being good enough to beat out Mertz next season. Partially because I don't see them bringing in a hyped up QB (best ever for WI) and then sitting him two years in a row. If he is even remotely close to Coan or better he probably will be the guy. If Coan is the starter again maybe Mertz is just overhyped? Well, if Mertz is really that much more talented than Coan physically, then spending a year getting used to the speed of the college game, he should have a lot more room to grow. It'd shock me to see him leave if Coan's good this year. You're saying he'd leave before they even had a competition. And he wouldn't gain anything.

Well then you're not gonna want Graham Mertz to "lead your team." After he couldn't win the job as a Soph, he transferred to his rival school. Sore loser. And that's High School. You really need to look around a bit closer at just how many kids have transferred. This "kids today," thing. Doesn't it ever...get old. How old do you have to be for this to start to sound exactly like what you used to hear? First time I heard it, I was 2 years out of college and coaching and a kid in my class(so another kid who was 24-25) started in on how "kids today, they're not as tough as we are, they don't play through pain, put in the extra time." I couldn't help but laughing. I was there to watch a UW recruit. I'm sitting there watching these kids who were 8 years younger and it was no different. Nothing had changed about those kids in those 8 years. That has always stuck with me because the "kids today," joke has been going for a long time, but that was the first time I ever heard it and I remember exactly what I was doing and what kids I was watching. Kids don't change. We get older and we forget about how Troy Aikman went to Oklahoma and they were changing their offense for this kid, this Freshmen phenom, but he didn't play enough as a Freshmen and then got hurt so he transferred. Or the dozens and dozens of guys who did transfer but it didn't make as much news or the dozens and dozens who didn't because the petty NCAA made it tougher than it needed to be. Being a talented QB who transfers because you lose your job doesn't make you a "loser," or some mentally weak, spoiled kid who thinks he's entitled. It makes you SMART. Jalen Hurts could have spent the rest of his time at Alabama sitting behind Tua...or he could transfer to Oklahoma and become one of the top QB's in college and that change will probably make him millions. Spoiled kid! Looking ahead and seeing that there is a elite QB who's already entrenched...it doesn't make you a loser. You want a kid who'd rather beat his head against the wall or would you rather have a kid with common sense. Baker Mayfield, Kyler Murray, the last two Heisman....they...transferred. I guess there was this Mahomes kid. Anyway, is Baker a loser? Kyler? And as far as Fields, Kirby Smart; according to him, he had to be careful, because when you have an "alpha," like Jake(Fromm) you have to be careful how much playing time you're giving to "the next big thing." You don't want it to "mess with his head." So I just think it's funny how you chastise the kid who decides to go to an NFL factory where he'd play right away. Kirby SMART was alright with it, he understood. So I have to wonder why you're coming down so hard on them? I mean, he wasn't just a "good recruit," he was a great recruit, #2 only behind the best HS prospect 247 has ever scouted in Lawrence. But you talk about toughness and Fromm's own coach said he had to be careful to not play the uber talented Fields too much because he didn't want Fromm to get insecure about his spot in the lineup. I'm sorry, I find this laughable. The way these coaches just absolutely bow down to these kids, they way they lie to them, how they recruit multiple players at the same position and promise all of them playing time, how they promise they're going to stick around and then they just jump up and leave when A&M comes with a bigger offer. But now we're now getting upset when they do what's obviously best for them and they transfer to a school where they can play right away? Clemson has Trevor Lawrence. So obviously the QB who led them to a 16-1 record in the games he started and finished with his lone loss coming to Alabama in the College Football Playoffs, and the former 5 star recruit are going to transfer. It's presumptuous of you to assume that they're somehow upset they weren't handed something rather than it just being basic common sense on their part that they, like Mayfield and Murray are behind transcendent talents and they're not going to win that job. Coaches lie to kids, they tell them what they want to hear. That's how you get Fromm, Fields and Eason in the same QB room in a couple year period. Sometimes guys like Shea Peterson(the only QB ranked ahead of Eason in his class) just want a better fit so they transfer from Ole Miss to Michigan. And now, he's one of the top "young" starters in the country. Coaches over-recruit, they over-promise, they leave whenever it's convenient to them after promising a kid they wouldn't, after promising the school they wouldn't, and they've been doing this for decades. But now when you have these kids using the transfer rules to put them in the best situations possible...it's because of "kids today?" C'mon. And if "kids today," are so bad, then it's our/your fault. Whoever is the generation raising those kids that made them that way, right? But of course like all parents, it's never there kids. Of course the whole, "kids today," complaint is as old as time and "kids today," are probably more mature,more involved and active as the kids were 10 years ago, certainly ~20 years ago when I was in HS. These kids are using the rules available to them to try to get themselves to the NFL and it's working out well for almost everyone. Why would you want a 5 star recruit who's clearly one of the best players in the country sitting at Georgia OR taking over the job from Fromm when he can just take advantage of the rules and play for Ohio State? They're finally doing what the coaches who's been screwing with them for decades are doing. What's best for them. No he did not. He opened up his recruiting again. He went down to Georgia to WATCH the QB's you were just talking about in Fields and Fromm practice and he literally said that "of course I'm mindful of depth charts," ie, well, I like Georgia, but they've got a lot of studs. He took visits to Ohio State, Georgia, not sure if he took an official one to Clemson, but he talked about talking to Dabo and getting an offer from them. He committed early because he had 3 offers, Wisconsin, a directional Alabama and I don't even know if one of the Kansas schools was in on him, but UW was by far the biggest school. He ended up sticking with UW, but he didn't just pick UW and then "shut down all those big schools." He let those big schools woe him. Do you not recall him meeting with Urban Meyer and everyone just waiting, assuming he was gonna leave? Maybe we should all just take a step back and calm down on a kid that we don't really know. We don't need to anoint him the next great college QB and we don't need to put him up on this fictional pedestal above all the guys who couldn't compete with the starters in their respective programs like Jacob Fields, Kelly Bryants, Josh Jackson, Russ, Murray, Baker, Shea Patterson, hell, lets just go with half of the FBS programs starters and a quarter of their backups. He was in High School last year. Just..leave him be without you our own opinions and expectations onto him. He's a student-athlete. It's hard enough for these kids.

The response form his lawyer reads all kinds of shady. Seems real shady. I’ve never been sexually assaulted but unless she formed Stockholm Syndrome.... I don’t think driving state lines to come visit, asking for tickets from, and posting pictures with the one who had violated you all after the fact. Lawyers can make things seem false for sure and I haven’t read her side but as shady sounding as some Madison girls as of right now. mod edit You've really not been paying attention for the last couple years, have you? If you don't believe it or you find it suspicious, fine, but have you heard of this guy...big in the Film industry...Harvy Weinstein..the guy who came out and actually admitted to many of the things he was accused, and yet he had several of had academy award winning/high profile actresses at the height of their fame whom he'd sexually assaulted still taking pictures with him, still doing media with him, still showing up to parties at his place/with him. In fact this was the exact same tactic used by Roger Ailes as well. He'd show pictures of O'Reily or himself taking a picture with one of the many women assaulted or harassed there-AFTER the actual incidents took place in order to try to make the argument that you're making. Why on Earth would you pose in a picture with the person responsible(or at least partially responsible) for how you make a living after they've treated you badly. Yet all these "shady" people with "Stockholm syndrome," have done it time after time. And if you know enough about what Stockholm Syndrome is, you obviously know that's not even remotely applicable here, so it's more of a snide way of making a joke or being sarcastic and attacking her for continuing to work for the millionaire after the incident. But was there ever any hint that she held for extended periods against her will? No? Then no need to bring up Stockholm Syndrome. I'm going to make an assumption here, but if you know what Stockholm is, then you understand it has to do with kidnapping, so you mentioning it just comes off as really kinda obtuse In fact almost all of this reads like you hit your head about 6 years ago and you've missed everything that's happened since. There are literally hastags about victims. #whyIdidn'treport. Used to try and explain the very attacks you're using right now in a not so subtle way, dozens of stories about why women didn't come forward. Is Bill Cosby innocent because he takes a picture with one of his rape victims? I get people being suspicious. People should be suspicious of serious accusations. I'd also ask what this young women has to do with the young "Madison girls" but I already know it has nothing to do with them. They're women who've likely never met each other. Nothing I've read about her seems "shady" yet. She seemed like an elite athlete who now runs a gym training young Gymnasts. Everything I've read and seen about Antonio Brown as of late seems shady. Though that obviously doesn't mean he's guilty of sexual assault.