Kind of an odd statement, and I'm not sure what you're implying. In the end, the team's results rest on Stearns and CC. This year's results are still very much up in the air. As others have noted, it's worth seeing if it's a small sample size problem or indicative of a larger issue. Right now, I maintain that it's astoundingly unlikely that 8-10 players were acquired and suddenly performed as if they hadn't hit a baseball before. Hyperbole, of course, but still. Small sample is very, very possible, which means no one is to blame, but that's not what the 'fans' want to hear. If it's indicative of a larger problem, my point is that it is far more likely that the approach that the Brewers are preaching offensively is the issue rather than a sudden inability to evaluate talent by a front office that has shown immense skill in that area. I have been a very strong supporter of both Craig Counsell and David Stearns since they arrived in the mid-2010s. However, for those of you that are also Packer fans, I am starting to get a similar sense to what happened with the Packers as it relates to the Brewers with Mike McCarthy (Counsell), Ted Thompson (Stearns) and Dom Capers (Haines). Counsell, who was once so innovative, has appeared to grow similarly stale, ala McCarthy, in the past few years as the Brewers no longer mix and match pitchers, have set Williams and Hader as the 8th and 9th inning only guys, and no longer uses the hit and run or steals to press the issue. McCarthy never adjusted to the McVay-type offenses and the game appeared to have passed him by. The larger issue I am seeing is with Stearns and Haines, similar to Thompson and Capers. Every year between 2012-2019, the Packers drafted consensus 1st round defensive talent. The picks were not "reaches" based on pre-draft rankings and Capers literally did nothing with their talent to make them close to a top 10 D except put square pegs in round holes (Nick Perry and Datone Jones come to mind). Is that a miscalculation in talent by ALL NFL evaluators, Thompson included, or was this an indictment of Capers coaching abilities? I tend to think it was the coaching. Similarly, whereas Stearns may have not given Haines 1st round picks, he has given him established, average offensive baseball players (JBJ, Narvaez, Garcia, Cain) who should at worst be able to give the Brewers a league-average offense when combined with a superstar (Yelich) and one that was budding (Hiura). Instead, they are amongst the worst and don't have answers in the past 100 games (60 in 2020 and 40 in 2021). So is it Stearns or Haines fault? I tend to think it is coaching. Like I said, I see a lot of parallels between the two situations and I think it is really about faulting one or the other but not both. In the case of the Packers, they should have been at worst a top 12 D with the amount of 1st round talent provided. With the Brewers, they should be the 14-18th best O in the sport when you look at the talent and track record of the players in the everyday lineup, but they are one of the worst.