102 OPS+ at a corner spot with zero (and arguably negative) defensive value isn't "above average". Granted I shouldn't have used the "above average" adjective, but the gist (jist?) of my argument was a relative analysis of the different 25th men and why there seems to be a "double" standard. I still maintain that there is a weird "bias" against LH. But I will say that I cringed whenever he'd bat 3rd (!), and was touted as a stud, because, as we all know, the sure way to fix a last place team is by adding a pinch hitter (and then starting him!). I don't want to give the impression that in any way I wanted, liked, or enjoyed having "the Weapon" (ok I did enjoy having him as a target) around. I wasn't happy that we had Lenny Harris, and I dished out my (yours, and probably 10 others peoples) share of crap at him and Jervy Lopester, but in the end he did perform well for that 1 season he was with the Brewers. As Robert pointed out that may have been an abberation, but I think too many people are sticking with the perception that Harris was crap, TD is OK, and Cirillo will regain the fountain of above-average-youth (all data to the contrary). Subjectivism vs. Reality? Pessimism vs. Optimism? I think it's a little bit of both with a tad bit of what MSC was alluding to and something I'm sensing might be a player in all of this (even if it's only at a subconcious level).